charles_twiss1
-
Posts
62 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Image Comments posted by charles_twiss1
-
-
Has the background been manipulated? If not, it's a really striking picture.
-
Nice picture the dark background sends the viewer straight to the eyes and keeps them there.
-
-
-
Lighting a bit too strong on one side but I really am looking for fault now! Nice picture, the sort you would'nt get fed of hanging on your wall even if the dog was not yours.
-
Distortion....so what. Imagine you exhibited the print. Would you expect a viewer to say,"Nice picture, shame about the distortion" or "Nice picture, shame it was'nt taken with a Canon, Minolta, Pentax, $500 lens, $1000 lens"
You can go on forever chasing equipment and the perfect picture. If a National Geographic Photographer produces the perfect picture, it's either only perfect to some, ( you may not like it) or credit is given to his/her armoury of expensive gear. pictures should speak for themselves and this one does. Spend the money on travelling to wherever you took it and take some more!
-
Nice! I like this one.
-
Fabulous picture. Real pro quality. The catchlight in the eyes draws the attention immediately to the face. Not so sure about the hand on the head making the elbow a bit prominant but still a cracking picture.
-
-
Not enough detail in the background. Dropped off into a black hole. Ansell Adams- rest peacefully it will soon pass.
-
-
Boring.
-
If it was hanging on the wall say, 30"x40" it's the sort of picture that would really wick you off after a couple of days. Overdone!
-
If it was'nt for the fact the building is'nt straight, the viewer would think it was two seperate pictures.
-
-
Just another flower picture!
-
Palace of Winds - has the wind blown it over?
-
-
-
Sorry, does'nt do much for me. The main subject (presumably the boy?) is lost and overall the picture is confusing. There is too much going on and attention is lost. The missing bench on the right is annoying as balance is lost. Does'nt work as an upright either!
-
What can you say about a line of trees mirrored by a line of fencing? What's it about? Apart from control over depth of field.
Sir Henry
in Abstract
Posted