ronno
-
Posts
10 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by ronno
-
-
<p>Only the video clips were shot with the G9 ;-)</p>
-
<p>This shoot used Canon 1Ds3, 85mm 1.2, 50mm 1.4...and Profoto lighting </p>
-
<p>You can do this with almost any light source, or window light for that matter. The key is to make sure that there is no light bouncing back onto your subject from the side opposite the light source. So if you are in a small room with white walls for example, you'll probably need to put black fabric or black foam core on camera left so that side goes dark. Try it.</p>
-
<p>The banding issue is not just for sRAW. Canon have also acknowledged that Highlight Tone Priority causes banding. (it does not cause banding in the 1Ds3 camera...)<br>
http://www.afashionshooter.com/2008/12/20/5d2-af-in-dim-light/</p>
-
<p>Thanks John. I am in touch with Canon about the focus issues...we'll see if that is a design issue or if it's just my camera. I looked on my hard drives at past shoots and found that the focus was far superior on the original 5D as to focus in dim light! I was getting around 80-85 % in focus using the outer AF points in relative darkness, now I am getting maybe 50% with the mark II. I put a detailed update on the blog so Canon support could see it.<br>
http://www.afashionshooter.com/2008/12/20/5d2-af-in-dim-light/</p>
-
<p>I have several posts about using the new 5D Mark II for a fashion shoot, and other thoughts after using the camera for a couple weeks.There are also many sample images.<br>
In short, IQ is great, the outer AF points still stink in the dark (as the Mark I did.), but the camera is indeed nice to use. See the writings here:<br>
www.afashionshooter.com</p>
-
<p>I think the Canon 85 1.8 is very hard to beat. I own it as well as the 1.2 II and they are both great lenses. The 1.8 is much lighter, smaller, and has faster AF. I would not hesitate to buy it.<br>
Here is the 1.8 on a 5D:<br>
http://www.pbase.com/r_p/image/50940887/original</p>
<p> </p>
-
I suggest the 35mm or the 50mm. 85 is a litle long for general kid shooting, IMO. The 50 1.8 is great optically, but it
feels like cheap junk. The 1.4 is a great performer, but some of them are soft wide open. The 85 1.8 is great and
sharp, but probably too long for this purpose. I wrote a brief article abot 50mm lenses on my blog the other day:
Need Second Shooter in Pasadena CA Feb 23rd
in Wedding & Event
Posted
<p>So your gift is to get someone to shoot the wedding for free?<br>
Wow, that sure is generous. :(</p>