mikael eriksson

Hi, thanks for all the great answers.

Hiro: Okay, that sounds great.

Michael: I checked the reviews and it looks like the 17mm has hardly no Vignetting, better CA and Distortion values than the 12-24mm. On the other hand the 12-24mm seems to be a bit sharper.

Dave: Okay, thats strange, accordingly to the reviews at Photozone it should have less CA than the 12-24mm. You dont happen to have an example picture to show me?

Bill: I have not thought about the sigma lens, will have a look on it.

Peter: Yes, have also heard that the tokinas are built really solid. Regarding Sigma, dont they have a more plastic feel overall?

I have a Nikon D80 and have been thinking about buying me a wide lens.

I have been looking at the Tokina AT-X 17 AF PRO

(http://www.thkphoto.com/products/tokina/afl-01b.html)which is out of

production, but still available in asia and the Tokina AT-X 124 AF PRO

(http://www.thkphoto.com/products/tokina/afl-00b.html).

I will use the lens for landscape, street and travel shooting. Which one should

i buy? Which one is sharpest? How is AF speed on these two?

Could really need some input from you people who have tried these lenses.

Regards.

Mikael