isa

Ok. Thankyou for your time...i hope all will be resolved asap.-

To day, now, seems all resolved. Thankyou .

I have no idea what is happening really, but I am having trouble with unresponsive links, sites going to error messages, etc on many sites, not just P,net.

I have problems with all the links to my original in Ph.net from FB. And when i enter without a link with "sign in" 404 for the larger format.

From one week , perphaps less days, the situation is the same. 404 and 410...problems growing...

There are currently problems unlikely to be fixed on a Holiday week end. Sorry for the inconvenience, I'd suggest waiting to see what Tuesday brings. Unfortunately I have no method available to alter the situation.

Ok. Thankyou for your time...i hope all will be resolved asap.-

I have problems...all links from social to the original are 410 or 404. - It's also impossible inside Pn open the photo clikking on th title, i mean in larger format.-

In this folder,( i post relative link) i am not able to submit one new post. Not open details, neither click request critique

etc. Is the first time in many years. Can someone help me? Thankyou!

 

http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=1062591&show_admin_options=1#

<p>I spent few years ago seven thousand Euro for a CANON 1 DS MARK II...Now (perfect model)<br>

some would offer me seven eight hundred....But this is not important....For me my Mark II worth the money and i don't follow every year the evolution of technology.Some changes are only status simbols...i mean minimum changhes...3 03 five MPX more??!?!</p>

<p>is interesting the words of Indraneel and D700 is the best of all in mention.</p>

<p>In any way, if you keep FM2, (i have one), you must work with a good scanner for complete your work and have minimum some corrections in post productions.<br /> LENS:<br /> also only<br /> 50 1,4<br /> AND ONE OLD 80-200 ONE TOUCH may give very good results.<br /> Sorry for may pedestrian english...</p>

<p>This is results of "older" zoom on D90,( vith monopod!!)<br>

You mau see by yourself and make one own your opinion,<br>

80-200 NIKON 2,B ONE TOUCH...The oldest.<br>

<a href="../photodb/folder?folder_id=933252">http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=933252</a></p>

<p>70-200 NON is -- You need upgrade for indoor minimum 7D.</p>

<p>D90 - </p>

<p>D700 is clearly far superior in low light.I have worked on RAW files underexposed and the results are wonderful and incredible.Ithink i the best sensor to day in the middle - high class of cost. Far superior vs. D 90.</p>

<p>Well: you must have on another body with you, because is impossible to repeat the event, and if impossible you keep away another battery.If you are not a prof, you shoud make few thinghs and made well. But perhaps is better no make wedding at all if you are not sure. It's a great responsability and you will have never another chance to repeat something of wrong.</p>

 

<p>it may be that the white of the wall makes you take underexposed the woman because the camera says"how much white so is enough!"" So, you must work with a compensation of the exposure,<br>

White in the frame +1, or more steps/-----black in the frame-1 or 2 steps.This expecially if you don'have on in theese situations a measure SPOT of the light, but a medium central or global measurement.<br>

But you try to test with neutral gray on the wall, if is always underexposed, and you have no compensation in camera, go to the assistance.D 90 and SB is a good company for me.<br>

Sorry for my pedestrian english i hope you may undestand</p>

<p>The best congrats to our winners and good uck to their works !!</p>

<p>eos 1 ds markII-Monopod- 2 starlight -2 580 ex -lens 24-70 2,8</p><div></div>

OK.Thankyou for your work.I appreciate very much.

I don't want speak fot the past times.Beside this, i have a very poor english to catch all the aspects of the problem.Sorry for eventually misunderstanding...

But with the total respect for all the people here and the work of administrators i think that i hope that this problem will be resolved asap.And i am highly in accordance with the words of Juha Kivehas.

I think that the fact that only hundred person write on this fact of the views, is for tolerance and good manners and kindness for the administrators.

Nobody may think that is ininfluence and of no importance having a counter for the photo..I hope to have again a simple counter of views, also witout the views of this past month.A new counter.

in any way i would prefer sometime have a softer contact from the site versus the persons that have some complaint.You are a site of mondial preminence.You are photonet and for this i think is better be softer and no ironic also if you are tired or disturbed for ours posting.Personally this is the first question for which i make a post here and i prefer no have the sensation that i'm disturbing somebody..I only ask.No soap opera, only a problem for which i ask., And hope to receive kindness and no irony or hard contact with the administrators.

In digital is essential learning well the post process technique.and always to know well your camera.

Best to you and new family!

usually i use a eos 1 ds mark II.Well i may say that prints in A4 format, 20x30 with 50 1,4 or also with 18-55 in kit at 16 is better than prints at 24 on 24-70 canon.

In any way, for sharpness,(not resolution) D50 is on top.

I hope the counters of views will be ok in a not too long time

135 CANON EF USM L-2.0

Because is the sharpest ( i have used)

also for me is some problem with the views for several days.

I hope this will resolve the next days.

In any way i appreciate very much all the work and the new changes of the site. and the works of administrators.

Thankjou very much.

may be a problem with the different conditions found by the system on focus.

In a subject in movement with a variant backgound the system retard his action and must read continually what it is viewing.I think is very important sometimes have a restricted area of focus(perhaps follow continually the short of the runner of one runner of the group).Another factor maybe the buffer.But one have to think individually on the specific situation.