pahrkm
-
Posts
165 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by pahrkm
-
-
<div>
</div>
-
-
<div></div>
-
<div></div>
-
-
<div></div>
-
<div></div>
-
<div></div>
-
<div></div>
-
-
-
<div></div>
-
"Moving images can never be this potent."
I have to disagree with that statement. I saw the images of the prisoners and I was appalled. However, I could not force myself to watch the video of a prisoner having his head cut off. THAT was too potent for me. I'm not trying to make a political statement here - just addressing the potency of moving images vs. still.
-
<div></div>
-
<div></div>
-
<div></div>
-
<div></div>
-
<div></div>
-
<div></div>
-
-
<div></div>
-
<div></div>
-
I have to admit to downloading photos in the past. Some that I thought were great pictures, and some that I wanted to share with my husband who isn't a member of Photo.net. I never considered using those pictures in any way . . . neither as wallpaper or for print. I viewed them and shared them and soon after deleted them. And when I downloaded them I used the artist's title of the piece and his/her name as the title so that those. I was new to photo.net at the time and have since learned better ways to navigate to those pictures, such as "Mark this person as interesting".
-
Sounds as if you are saying that a photographer who does not develop his own film is not quite a "real" photographer. I know one professional who makes his living solely from sales of his pictures would take exception with that thought.
Expression's
in No Words
Posted