tripanfal

Plus-x in Diafine

Emma with her new make-up kit, Dad with the new lens.

Nice shot, excellent expressions. The frame fits well.

Details say Nikon F100, care to share film, developer used?

Kind of a dreamy, looking onto the future thing...

Any thoughts?

Thanks. This is a scan and posted from my uncalibrated laptop LCD. The negative is nice. I'm on my work PC now and it looks terrible. :(

...still looks like it is leaning to the right a bit...

Looking to print this in the darkroom but it feels off balance. I'm

open to crop suggestions. If you think it's bad overall I'd like to

hear why. This is a 35mm scan.

Thanks!

-Chris

A different perspective of the same truck. Wish I had a fisheye that

day...

Scanned negative of my first "keeper" darkroom print.

Epson 4490.

Hmmm... I sense hostility. I find them boring, yes. Boring because I find them cliche. (most of the time) I find most flower shots to be the same old, seen it before type shot, etc...I find it difficult to be original when shooting flowers.

I shot this as more of a film test, doing some bracketing on a tripod, no flash, lit from above with my kitchens' recessed light. I found the glow to be interesting and was just wondering what others thought.

I apologize if I wasted your time.

I don't usually shoot flowers. I think they are rather boring, and

this is no exception for me, BUT I like the glow I got from this

particular film/developer. The print held highlight detail very

well, this is a scan of the actual print. I think I had a +3 closeup

lens attached to my 50mm lens. Pan F in Diafine. EI: 50.

Rated so high and no comments...

As nudes go I like this. The pose and lighting is very nice. The models teeth are distracting to me though. Maybe a shot with the mouth closed?