Jump to content

kit_chong

Members
  • Posts

    106
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by kit_chong

  1. I have both and finally kept the 50/1.2 L. It has better bokeh. It focuses much slower than than 1.4 in my opinion especially for very near objects. I shoot at 1.2 all the time with this lens and that's the purpose of the purchase. Do a search on Flickr and you'll see many photos taken using the 50/1.2.
  2. I am also a EOS 1v shooter. I have the Canon 24/1.4 and 24-70/2.8. Unfortunately I don't have 17-40/4 and will not be able to comment. I like the 24/1.4 over the 24-70/2.8 for less distortion and better sharpness. I shoot lots of available light handheld using Velvia 50, Kodachrome 64 and 200 so I love fast lenses. Another lens for you to consider is the new 16-35/2.8L II. This would be my next lens.
  3. I have a 1v and love it. Recently Fuji announced the reintroduction of Velva 50. I have both digital and film cameras. I also shoot with rangefinders and medium format cameras. For portraits, I shoot digital and for my personal work I shoot mostly film and sometimes digital. The 1v is an incredible camera. Enjoy them while they are around. I will not regret if they slowly disappear into the darkness. They are only a tool for my photography. The used prices are great these days. I would not hesitate to get another body in the near future as soon as I get all the L lenses that I need.
  4. I was researching on the D-lites. I don�t think you can trigger them wirelessly and control them remotely. You can trigger them using an optical slave. Because of these two factors I bought something else. I need to control the lights remotely.
×
×
  • Create New...