philip_canavespe

Frankly James, it could have been cropped with the same effect, not taking away from the collage. Again, just trying to get some guidelines for young eyes.....we've beaten this horse to death and no clear cut.....you give an inch and take a mile.....70's mags no pubes, 80's some pubes, 90's full shot, 2000 full penetration...where do you want this website to go???? I made my comment about non subscribers already. I also take offense to any mutilation or violent photos you refer to. Regards, Phil

Bob, I believe we are on the same wavelength. As a basic rule, no genitalia, seems simple to me. As for Topher B. ante your $25.00. There is enough "Art" on other pages bad an good.

I like the answer that it could be filtered. Fine art woould not exisit if it wern't for religion and nudes. I just don't need young eyes to have immediate exposure. Best intentions, Phil

I'm frankly offended by some of the erotica appearing in the forums

as this is a publicly accessed site. There should be some guidelines

especially to exposure of genitalia etc. I'm no prude but this site

has provided an avenue to spark an interest for young photographers

(I know several). I believe there should be a review and place thse

photos in a special section that is further password protected. Some

of the material posted is not suited for the under 14 age group. I'll

be the first to get my password and offer reviews and ratings!!!!!

I totally agree....sucks......Phil