stephen_ascherl
-
Posts
87 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by stephen_ascherl
-
-
<p>Another vote here for a Summaron 3.5 or 2.8, but it really depends on how much your willing to spend? At one extreme, a Summicron 35/2.0 "eight element" in LTM is rare and very collectible, at the other various Japanese products as mentioned above? Most of us will acknowledge the Leica product as holding value better than something from VC. I personally had a VC Ultron f1.7: found it too large, with a poor quality mount, and quite expensive as well!</p>
-
<p>The tripod is a period correct piece too; the case for both the camera and tripod seem in fine condition, the camera likely very little used. Be careful, handle it gently, store it in a cool dry area...and maybe even consider learning how to use it?</p>
-
<p>I've been through this with a rather nice Summarit 1.5 in LTM mount. I had it cleaned of fog, and it had only minimal cleaning marks on the front element. It's still a mediocre performer in my experience, especially wide open. If you appreciate fantastic build quality, and "atmospheric" effects however, consider getting an example without fungus and having some fun?</p>
-
<p>Very nice! I wonder if you took the same pictures with something as elegant as a Monochrome Leica and APO Summicron 50/2.0...if anyone could tell the difference?</p>
-
<p>I've had him do CLA on three lens: Telyt 200/4.0, Summarex, and Summarit 50/1.5. In all cases, fast turnaround, sensible price, very nice work! He's my "go-to" Leica repair service now.</p>
-
<p>Thank you for the responses. It's a strange question I know. I'm using a Telyt 200/4.0 on Viso I and so a tripod is really required, and the 45 degree finder is convenient, and the other II and III advantages you mention not particularly needed.</p>
-
<p>Is there any advantage to a Visoflex II or III with OUBIO, as compared with Visoflex I (or PLOOT, which I think is basically the same, but which I have never seen!)? I actually prefer the 45 degree finder on Viso I.</p>
-
<p>...thank you/interesting response! I still have the film cameras, nowadays only for display, but doubt I'll ever use them again. I use a base M9 which I think is a wonderful camera!...I also have a Summicron 50/2.0 V5, but the internet tells me the earlier Summicron DR is an interesting/historically important lens to use?...I really don't like to destroy things, but...</p>
-
<p>I have a very nice Summicron DR 50/2.0. I think I'll never use film (M3, M4, M6) again. Should I convert the DR to fit the digital M? </p>
-
<p>I'd buy a Monochrome and an APO Summicron!</p>
-
<p>Until a few months ago, M9 with Summicron 35 ASPH...then with the sensor problem, M6 with Summicron DR, and now again and with the sensor replaced, the M9/ASPH: I just love that M9!</p>
-
<p>Thanks to all of you for very astute advice...it's a "no brainer" decision!</p>
-
<p>I have sent my previously-though-of-as-wonderful M9 to Leica for rangefinder calibration. I've been quoted a cost of $500 to do this calibration, and been offered a sensor upgrade at no cost. Is an M9 worth spending $500 on, given the well publicized issue with sensor corrosion? I REALLY had liked this camera, but...</p>
-
<p>For M9 and for general photography, my basic kit is a Summicron 35 ASPH and Summicron 75 ASPH. I need to "go wider"! I think 21mm is maybe beyond my skill set, and 28 is too close to 35mm? What about 24mm in it's various incarnations: Elmarit, or Summicron? I prefer to stay with Leica lens.</p>
-
<p>Interesting choice, and in my opinion, a sensible one. You have just purchased the photographic equivalent of a BMW R51/3! I'd predict that you'll be looking to buy a M3 or M2 before long.</p>
-
<p>Is there anyone who can do a CLA and shutter curtain replacement on a 1957 VXlla?</p>
-
<p>...it's a very early production camera, the serial number is about sequential from Leica #1. It's a real collectors item, maybe not suitable to use to learn 35mm film photography with? Some here will say "yeah, just use it, that's what it's for", but others would advise you keep it in your safe deposit box, and buy a modern 35mm camera for $25-30 to learn on... </p>
-
<p>The amount of verdigris suggests that's it's been sitting in that case for a very long time? What a wonderful find!</p>
-
<p>....on the front lens ring it will be engraved "5cm", i.e. 50mm...beautiful camera; may we see a picture of the back of the camera?...yes, the viewfinder framing image is only approximate...</p>
-
<p>If as mentioned the covering on that camera is not original, is it a good idea to recover it, or should it be left as-is?</p>
-
<p>Why doesn't Nikon come out with a digital version of the Nikon SP, or F or F2, or for that matter, the N70: full frame sensor but with manual focus, capability to use the older accessories and glass, deletion of "unnecessary" complexity, appearance and build quality similar to the original cameras...something like the Leica M9?</p>
-
<p>...oh yes, for close up work only, and with Viso II...the micro Nikon is such a fine lens (and low priced!), and it's a pity not to use it for something?...but thank you, I didn't know the 65mm Elmar had that type of rear element...the cardboard tube is a great suggestion...</p>
-
<p>Is there any Nikon F to LTM adapter? I wish to use a Nikon micro 55mm f3.5 with a Visoflex.</p>
-
<p>...Gee whiz...and to think that I thought Leica were gadgets designed to take photographs, and seals were something one saw at the zoo eating fish!...</p>
Nikkor 28cm f3.5 ltm
in Leica and Rangefinders
Posted