Jump to content

chip_greenberg1

Members
  • Posts

    19
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by chip_greenberg1

  1. Dan, you did not mention a budget!! I've been using a Kowa 6MM for 6+

    months now and am quite happy. the lenses are excellent, and I picked up a

    body with 80 that had been CLA'd, a 250 that looks new, and a 55 that is in

    great shape for about $1000 with some vigilent shopping.

     

    Good luck

    Chip

  2. I'd suggest looking into a sinar camera. The F series is more affordable.

    Sinar has a system for focusing that really simplifies focusing while making it

    much more precise.

     

    I had used a Cambo for years and thought Sinar's were overpriced. The sinar

    rep showed me how their camera worked and loaned me one for a week. I

    sold my cambo the following week!

    Chip

  3. Ken, I was a working pro for 20 years and now am a "hobby" photographer.

    At one point of my carreer I got tired of the frequent need to CLA my

    Hassleblads and sold the system for an RZ 67. The RZ felt a lot cheaper and

    "plasticy" but worked flawlessly. the lenses were on par w/Zeiss, I'd give the

    RZ tele-apo's a slight edge over the Zeiss. I liked the Zeiss wides better.

    Overall the Mamiya glass was a bit more contrasty.

     

    I think mamiya's webpage lists a chart comparing the 645 lenses resolution to

    the contax 645 lenses if that's of interest.

     

    happy shooting

    Chip

  4. Hi Steinar. All of the above are good suggestions, and if I had the budget ,

    with the type of work you do I'd do with the mamiya 6 or 7. That being said,

    the Mamiya 645 is reasonably priced also.

     

    I have been working with a Kowa. Great lenses and reasonably priced. You

    might want to look for a Kowa 6 and a 55 on Ebay.

     

    Good luck

    Chip

  5. Zel, it's anot as big a deal to CLA the older Bronicas or Kowas as you think. I

    have been using Ross Yerkes in LA. He is an ex-Kowa repairman and has

    hundreds of these around his house. Spare parts are not problem into the

    forseable future. There are a couple othe similar Kowa specialists out there ,

    and no doubt the same for Bronica.

    Chip

  6. OK, it's been over 10 years since I used my Sinar F so I'm not going to give

    you detail on the technique. However, with all due respect, to ignore sinar's

    focusing system is to ignore the camera's greatest asset. Before I bought my

    first P the local Sinar rep loaned me a P to use for a week. Before that week I

    was convinced the camera was way overpriced and was going to buy a

    Horseman. By the time the week was up I was sold and eventually ended up

    with 2 4x5 Sinars and 1 8x10 for my studio. The ability to chose exactly where

    I want the plane of focus to fall was a HUGE advantage over the Cambo I had

    been using with center tilts. I was able to sleep at night without worrying

    about focus problems, use bigger aperture in the sweet spot of the lens, and

    needed less flash power. Since I retired from commercial photography I

    believe Sinar's patent ran out and I see other cameras that appear to have a

    similar build. Learn how to use that focusing technique and you will never

    look back.

    Chip

  7. Zel: I went through a similar situation about a year ago and ended up with a

    Kowa MM. You didn't mention what you shoot. I have shot in the past with

    both Hasselblad system (500cm) and RZ 67. I shoot mostly landscapes and

    use the camera on a tripod. I also wanted interchangeable lenses, and leaf

    shutters and mirror lock up to reduce vibrations at exposure time.

     

    I'm very happy with the Kowa. There have been some concerns on the web

    about durability, but I take my time when I shoot and have not had a problem.

    My camera and lens were CLA'd, and I recommend putting money aside for

    that or finding on that has been CLA'd. I have had good luck finding lenses

    on eBay, but you need to be patient and wait for the right one. The lenses are

    single coated, so us a hade. But they are absolutely as nice as my Blad

    lenses where. The 55, 110 macro, 150, 200, and 250 are all relatively

    available and affordable. $200-350 depdning on condition, if it's been CLA'd

    etc. The 40 and 35 are a bit harder to find and quite a bit more money.

    However if you like wide angles the fct a 35 is made for this camera is a real

    boon!

     

    Good luck

    Chip

  8. Pete, I picked up a Kowa 6MM a few months ago with an 80 and a 200. The

    80 is in for CLA now, and most people feel you will need to CLA any of these

    as they are all at least 25 years old.

     

    do you have a Kowa 6 or 6MM? It would say 6MM on the nameplate. The

    behavior sounds a bit like when I lock the mirror up on mine before exposure.

    Feel free to email me if you want more detail: chipg@pvtn.net.

     

    Ross Yerkes # is 323-256-1018. Figure about $150 ea to CLA body and lens

     

    This website is loaded w/info:http://medfmt.8k.com/mf/kowafaq.html

     

    All being said, I'm delighted with the optical quality of my lenses so far. Good

    luck.

    Chip

  9. Greg, I just got me first rolls of film back from the Kowa 6MM I bought for $300

    and I'm delighted. the store CLA'd the lens and the body is is nice shape. I

    also bought a 200mm lens for $325 that looks mint and is as sharp as

    anything I ever had on my 'blad. I think for the money this gear is great. You

    have to remember these cameras are 20+ years old. You'd be hard pressed

    to find a Hasselblad that old that doesn't need A good CLA. It is generally

    recommended to use the wind knob as a knob, not extend the crank which

    puts extra roque on the wind gears. I think you will be happy

    Chip

  10. Hi Folks: I'm looking to do some landscape shooting next week with either

    Portra VC 160 or Supra Kodak 120 color neg film. Anybody worked with

    these. I�m looking to try neg film and see how it scans for printing compared

    to my usual Velvia. Since I typically shoot Velvia the VC part of the Portra is

    appealing but Kodak�s website says �for controlled lighting situations� I take

    that to mean studio. Anybody worked with these and have comments?

    Thx

    Chip

×
×
  • Create New...