Jump to content

majk

Members
  • Posts

    19
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by majk

  1. I have one and used it for a while. I liked how well it handled larger lenses like 80-200 2.8

    zooms with the hood. You can use it as a shoulder bag or a backpack. It's reasonably

    comforable as a backpack. It holds a lot, and is well constructed. Ultimately I found I was

    carrying too much for my shoulder and went back to cloth domke bags, which I find more

    comfortable and easier to work out of (not comparable bag,s though.) It still has a role

    when I need the small backpack format.

     

    My only real complaint is this: it's a good shape and configuration when you're carrying

    the bigger zooms, but the flap is kind of big and in the way, which makes it harder to

    work out of, in a dynamic over the shoulder way. Depends on what you need and what

    your usage pattern is.

  2. Take a good look at the AF-S 28-70mm f/2.8, it's really a very useful lens in this context.

    I'm not so enamoured of the 105 macro as a portait lens. I think the quick and quiet

    operation of the AF-S lenses is of value especially during the ceremony. Just my $0.02.

  3. I you want an extended service agreement, consider a Mack (available from B&H). I would

    tend to trust them more than Best Buy, and it costs substantially less. I have never had to

    make a claim; perhaps people who have can provide more information.

  4. I don't know if you've seen this already, but there is some information online that

    may answer some of your sizing questions:

     

    http://www.saundersphoto.com/html/domkest.htm

     

    You can also get different inserts to suit your needs. Wraps or neoprene lens bags

    can supplement the padding without adding bulk.

     

    This are great bags. I find they're the best "working out of bags" I've seen. These are

    not bulky bags. As such, the "too big" label is mostly a matter of weight: if you load

    up a big bag with your entire system, it could be a drag.

     

    I personally have the F-2 ("original"), F-4AF ("pro system"), and F-3X ("super

    compact"). I find the F-4AF a little better sized for modern AF camera (F-100) and

    2.8 lenses; the F-2 now contains my OM-1 system, which doesn't get out as much.

    Lately I choose the combination I want to bring and put it in either the F-4AF or F-3X.

    Anything more than a loaded F-4AF puts too much load on my shoulder, and I find a

    Trekker (backpack) more appropriate.

     

    I find the "post-office style" shoulder pad to be very worthwhile.

     

    I think of these as on-the-go, working-out-of bags, and when that's what I want I

    have found none better.

     

    Hope this helps.

  5. I use the Ricoh GR-1v as a take-anywhere pocket camera and generally love it, except

    for one annoying problem: I keep turning the date imprinting on by accident, and not

    noticing it right away. I never want the date imprinting on, and was wondering if

    anyone out there has any experience with this. Other than the obvious of

    remembering to check before each use, does any know of a (preferably

    nondestructive) way to disable this feature? Or any other suggestions? Like I say, I

    never want the date imprinting on... Thanks.

  6. The OM-2000 has both spot and center-weighted metering, the FM-10 only the

    latter. With the Nikon you have a more complete and modern lens selection

    available, a system to grow into. While there are many fine Olympus lenses out there,

    it appears to be a dead end. I believe these are similar cameras made by Cosina. You

    can do better than the zoom supplied -- consider a quality prime -- but the way its

    priced you might as well get the kit and go from there.

×
×
  • Create New...