Jump to content

Michael R Freeman

Members
  • Posts

    6,579
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by Michael R Freeman

  1. Evidence for that?

    Yes, the 50mm f/1.8 went through a few iterations cosmetically, but the optics remained pretty much the same throughout.

     

    It's very unlikely that Nikon would run two production lines for domestic and export sale...

     

    See Roland Vink's site. Nikon Lenses

     

    Serial numbers 2050001 - 226xxxx of the 50/1.8 pancake produced for the Japanese market. More than just cosmetics. While the optics may be the same/similar, having CLA serviced multiple copies of each and every version of the Ai/AiS 50/1.8 I can confirm that internal construction is quite different from all other 50/1.8 models.

    NIKKOR 50mm 1:1.8 S AIS 2257006

  2. There is also a difference in minimum focus distance. The 50/1.8s pancake in Dieter's link above (originally sold only in Japan, s/n 2050001 and up) has a 0.45m minimum focus versus 0.6m for the Mk.II chrome ring version of the Series E (s/n 1900001 and up). The final version of the AiS 50/1.8 Nikkor exported worldwide (s/n 4000001 and up) shared the 0.6m minimum focus of the Series E.

     

    There are also differences in internal construction. The Japan 50/1.8s pancake has all metal helicoids. The chrome ring Mk.II Series E (and final AiS 50/1.8 Nikkor) has metal (3) and plastic (1) helicoid threads.

     

    The Japan pancake and Mk.II Series E has a metal focusing ring. The final AiS 50/1.8 Nikkor has a plastic focusing ring. The Japan pancake has a metal aperture ring, the other two have a plastic aperture ring.

     

    See Roland Vink's excellent database here:

    http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/lenses.html#50slow

    • Like 2
  3. I have seen this as well. As Matthew noted, only suitable on certain early Nikkors where the rear skirt of the aperture ring would not touch the AI tab. There isn't actually enough material extending beyond the bayonet mount on these particular aperture rings to mill a notch to engage the AI tab for a John White style conversion.
  4. When you focus the 55mm Micro, you're turning two focusing helicals. When the grease gets stiff it puts a lot of strain on the parts. When rebuilding it's important to choose a suitable grease, very light, or the thing will still be stiff as heck. A grease suitable for most other lenses will be way too thick for the Micro.

     

    Yes. A lot of surface area on all those helicals. A very light grease and very little of it is required for smooth focusing. In my limited experience, it's the rear CRC group helicals (lower left) that are responsible for the very stiff focus (and sticky oily aperture blades) in a 55/2.8 lens that requires service. Bought one years ago for next to nothing that was literally locked up tight, but focused beautifully after a cleaning and relube.

     

    AiSMicroNikkor55f28MkI.thumb.jpg.70d00ecab8d3554bf0db989d3ad0fa5b.jpg

    • Like 5
  5. IMO that lens is beyond repair.

    Agreed. As noted, unless you have a secret parts source located at the end of a rainbow guarded by a tiny leprechaun for a lens that was discontinued 35 years ago, your only likely source for a rear element group is a donor lens. And if you're going to try to find and buy a donor lens, you might as well buy a good fully functioning lens. I doubt they are very expensive. Chances are also good that any lens with the severe impact damage shown in your photo has other hidden problems.

     

    If you want to have some fun, take a look at Richard Haw's directions here and see how far you can break this one down before you give up. ;):)

    Repair: Nikon 70-210mm f/4 Series-E

  6. If the aperture assembly is deep inside this lens, then it might have very long mechanical linkage(s) attached to the aperture ring that could make reassembly tricky. My guess is that the aperture is between the 3rd and 4th elements when viewed from the back? If you remove the mount screws and slowly lift it straight off, you will probably be able to see what is directly attached to the aperture ring. Might be a simple "fork" engaging another lever, or it could be a long lever fixed to the aperture ring reaching deeper into the lens.

     

    500f4afsII.jpg.86f27546cb0cdf6ac4b1358e404a11ee.jpg

    AF-S Nikkor 500mm f/4D IF-ED II

  7. It might not be "pro", but it's a robust and very well made DSLR with magnesium alloy body construction and a bright pentaprism viewfinder, shutter is tested to 150k cycles, it can autofocus older screwdrive AF/AF-D lenses and it meters with non-CPU manual focus Nikkors. In short, a great camera for beginners or even advanced amateurs who don't need or want the latest and greatest.

     

    And if I read the OP's post correctly, it was FREE! Can't go wrong with that. :)

    • Like 1
  8. The D7000 with the 18-105 is still a good combination today, although it is certainly not the latest and greatest. It is a fine set up for a beginner, especially if you don't need to pay for it.

     

    Absolutely. If you already own it, shoot with it, have fun with it. It's not the latest and greatest, but it's still a very capable camera. Truth be told, its capabilities probably exceed the needs of most people who still own one (myself included). Although I have not used the AF-S 18~105, it is a good lens for a beginner with a nice field of view from moderate wide angle to medium telephoto.

     

    I recently updated to FX with a D750, but I kept my D7000 for 300mm and longer telephoto use.

    • Like 1
  9. Hopefully you have a bad flash. The fact that it wakes up from standby mode and you are getting a flash ready indication in the viewfinder indicates that at least the F4 is communicating with the flash.

     

    I have a less than favorable opinion of the SB-600. The one I used to own failed twice. Official Nikon Canada unit. It would randomly not fire (on a D200), eventually to the point that it would not trigger more often than it would successfully fire. Sent it in to Nikon Canada and they repaired it. Forget what they replaced but it was a major repair. Used the repaired flash (now on a D7000) for probably less than 6 months after it was returned to me when it failed again, this time completely. Would not fire even off camera with the test button. Tossed the damn thing in the garbage and bought a new SB-700.

  10. A couple of things you might want to try:

    1. Take a cotton swab (aka "Q-Tip) wetted with isopropyl alcohol and clean all of the flash contacts on the hot shoe, including the ground (springy bit under the edges of the flash shoe mount).
    2. Pop off the viewfinder and do the same for both the gold contacts on the body and the pins on the underside of the DP-20 viewfinder.

    It's possible the the hot shoe not working because someone used a high voltage flash on it before.

    I would suspect the chance of this is pretty remote. The F4 flash sync system is good for up to 250v if my memory is correct.

     

    Good luck.

    (I miss my F4 ... fond memories of shooting with it)

  11. I would skip the F70/N70. Has a weird (to me anyway) user interface like no other Nikon camera. Designed by a Nikon engineer who was also a closet Star Wars fan me thinks.:);)

     

    F80/N80 is the best of the 3 you listed. When it was offered new, it was the top of the line consumer film camera in Nikon's lineup. F75/N75 was the next lower tier camera.

  12. Michael,

    Thanks to your excellent instructions, I was able to fix this problem on my FE. I have an FM (serial 2377xxx) with the same problem, however the mechanism is different from the FE/FE2/FM2 that you show above. Would you happen to know how the stop works in that camera? Thanks!

     

    I don't have an FM body to open up, but I do have an exploded parts diagram from an FM repair manual. Not sure if it applies to your serial number range, since if my memory is accurate, there were 2 different marks of the original FM series bodies? Anyway, part #464 in the drawing below is the lock lever on the FM.

     

    Hope that helps.

     

    FM_bottom.thumb.jpg.c93331567dd5706ef86c6a1809bc3dfb.jpg

  13. Has anyone had any experience buying a used lens from the Japanese photo store sellers on ebay and importing it into Canada? Any idea of the duties and taxes? Some their prices for the big primes are really good even if there are duties and taxes to import them.

     

    Yes. No duty. HST/GST only plus a handling fee if importing by the postal system. Don't recall what the handling fee was exactly, but it is a fixed cost and not related to the value of item. $15 or less I think.

  14. I entirely agree that it's most likely due to slop in the helicoid. Not sure about the key being to blame, or even adjustable though.

    <snipped>

    Early lenses like the 55mm f/1.2 (probably pre-AI and later AI converted) might have been made with a split helicoid key that could be opened up to take up wear. Later designs had no such refinement and can't be adjusted.

     

    Agree with Rodeo Joe that slop in the focusing helicoid is the likely source of your problem. While I have not serviced the 55/1.2, I have CLA'd many early Ai lenses from 24mm to 200mm, and a few pre-Ai models. All had helicoid keys that allowed the backlash in the focusing ring to be adjusted (the later AiS series have no such adjustment) . Either the key itself is adjustable (split key shown below) or if the key is solid the groove it rides in can be adjusted. If the backlash is really sloppy, or more likely the very tiny screws holding that small split key are loose, it will slightly bind in the groove when focusing and when it breaks loose the focus will jump.

     

    These early lenses have a very robust internal construction, so I would expect that a simple CLA will cure the problem.

     

    633746567_Pre-AiAi_helicoidkey.jpg.835cb254638f69665772303b674aadd0.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...