wayne_murphy4
-
Posts
3 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by wayne_murphy4
-
-
Correction to previous message.
<p>
Of course, the smaller back-focus dimension of the M lens is the
controlling factor. Therefore it looks like a digital M camera.
Have I got this right?
-
If you need depth of field read it from the lens scale. Early on, I
tried to keep everything in focus, trying to keep my 35 lens to F8 or
F5.6.
<p>
I now think that one of the main strengths of Leica lenses is that
they can deliver great photographs with both excellent in-focus and
out-of-focus areas, and this differential-focus quality is really
outstanding. I choose not to use the mythicial (mystical?)"B" word
to describe this effect.
<p>
It takes a bit of nerve/confidence to shoot at F2 or F1.4, but the
results can be spectacular. They can also be out of focus
sometimes. So what? Go for it.
What was your first "real" camera & why did you get it?
in Leica and Rangefinders
Posted
After a Voigtlander Vito B and the obligatory Pentax Spotmatic, I
bought a second hand Leica M3 for night candid shots for a studio -
commission on sales.
<p>
The Leica was great except that it gets a bit hot in Australia, and
on a warm night, I would get a film of perspiration on my forehead.
I was using an old Braun flash with the wet cell shoulder pack and
when I held the M3 against my forehead to shoot, the flash synchro
socket and cord was against my head. I would press the button and
POW! trigger voltage to the forehead. Some people say I've never
been the same, but then I always wasn't.