stewart_ethier2
-
Posts
14 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by stewart_ethier2
-
-
<I>Some subject matter can look quite gross in big prints,
especially head shots of people.</I><BR>
Doug, you apparently haven't seen Tracy Storer's 20x24 Polaroid
head shots. They are truly spectacular.
-
I was planning a darkroom in my new house (on a septic
system) until I read this. Are there any other solutions?
<p>
<p>
Information on Septic System Disposal
<p>
Kodak does not recommend the use of septic systems for
disposal of photographic processing chemicals because the
disposal of photographic processing solutions may affect the
proper operations of the septic system. Septic tank systems are
used for the disposal of domestic waste, primarily in areas
where municipal sewers are unavailable. Therefore, they are
engineered for that stated purpose, and operate with anaerobic
(in the absence of oxygen) biological action to accomplish the
treatment of discharged wastes.
<p>
Discharge from septic tank systems may adversely affect
sources of underground drinking water. Regulations have been
established by the federal Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) and many states to minimize that potential. Your U.S. EPA
Regional or State Administrator of the Underground Injection
Control (UIC) Program and/or local health department should be
contacted to determine whether the discharge of
photoprocessing effluents into your septic system is allowable.
Due to increased enforcement on disposal to Class V injection
wells which include septic tanks, thorough inquiry on the
regional, state or local compliance requirements is advised.
<p>
Other disposal options for your photoprocessing waste include
household hazardous waste collection facilities in your area,
discharge to a nearby municipal wastewater treatment plant, or a
licensed chemical hauler. Household hazardous waste
collection facilities are options only if you generate less than 100
kilograms (220 pounds) of hazardous waste per calendar
month.
<p>
Customers who use KODAK photographic chemicals can also
arrange to have their wastes properly treated and disposed of by
using the KODAK RELAY Program
-
My experience is similar to Mr. Congdon's. Ordered a Wisner
ULF camera, promised in 6 months, delivered in 10 months,
required to pay in full in advance. There were 4 defects in the
camera when delivered that Mr. Wisner promised to repair but
one year later has not done so. Buyer beware.
-
I've got one of the Calumet Polaroid manual processors. It
works very well and is very reliable. On the other hand it is quite
bulky and might not be suitable for backpacking. Also, it is not
very intuitive so I have to reread the instructions every time I use
it.
-
6x9 no, but 6x7 yes. The Goetschmann 8585AV Slide Projector
handles 6x7 slides in 85x85mm mounts and has audio-visual
capabilities. Very expensive German technology.
<p>
-
I just ran across a more recent Dykinga book, "Large Format
Nature Photography." Less than 6 months after publication, it
was already remaindered at a local bookstore. But think about it:
How many large format color nature photographers are there out
there? In any case, the book is highly recommended and the
pictures are beautiful.
-
The Nightline piece was superb. You can order a video of it
here:
http://www.abcnewsstore.com/product-details.cgi?_item_code=
N020307+01
.
-
Of course there are reasons it is a lost art ....
<p>
Manual metering is awkward while handholding an LF camera.
Film holders and darkslides are awkward while handholding an
LF camera. Depth of field is poor at f8. Film speeds are too
slow, especially in color.
<p>
Bottom line: you'll get better results from MF.
-
There was a piece on ABC tonight on Joel Meyerowitz'
photographic study of the World Trade Center, begun long before
9/11/01. Since then he has had daily access to ground zero, and
it seems the work is all 8x10. I'd love to see some of it. Has
anything appeared in print yet?
-
What's important is the ratio between consecutive focal lengths.
So if you find that your 110 and 180 are in about the right
relationship to each other (not too far apart), you'll want a lens of
focal length x, where
<p>
x/110 = 110/180,
<p>
i.e., x = 67.2. This suggests that a 65 would be best for you.
-
I have a 16x20 and can confirm that the Fujinon 600 C covers the
format with plenty of room to spare.
-
<I>I just cannot comprehend the level of obsessive behaviour
which forces you to go and buy a seperate 10 inch cable release
for each lens, pre-attached for speed. </I><BR><BR>
Many people do this, including such well known landscape
photographers as Tom Till. Obsessive? Maybe, but also very
convenient. .
-
This article is five days old. I'm posting it here for those who
might have missed it.
<BR>
Photographer admits fire role <BR>
By Angie Welling<P>
Deseret News staff writer<BR>
The nature photographer accused of setting fires at Delicate
Arch last year pleaded guilty Friday in federal court.<P>
Michael Fatali, Springdale, also pleaded guilty to setting two
fires in Canyonlands National Park in August 1997. The
36-year-old professional photographer faces up to six months in
prison and a $5,000 fine for each of the seven misdemeanor
counts.<P>
Fatali also agreed to pay full restitution to the National Park
Service for damage caused by the fires. Restoration is estimated
at more than $16,000.<P>
On Sept. 18, 2000, Fatali led a group of amateur
photographers to Delicate Arch to photograph the famous
four-story sandstone arch, which is the backdrop of some Utah
license plates. At his direction, Fatali's assistant and others from
the group set two fires, one directly under the arch and another to
the east of the structure. Aluminum baking pans brought along to
contain the fire failed, and the flames scorched and discolored
the sandstone. Fatali tried to stomp out the fires, but one was
still burning when the group left the area.<P>
Park visitors reported the damage to rangers the next
morning.<P>
Officials were able to remove some of the scorch marks
immediately, but remaining scars from the fire could not be
removed because an oily or waxy stain had penetrated the
rock.<P>
Fatali on Friday also admitted to starting two fires in
Canyonlands National Park, the first on Aug. 12, 1997, at
Horsehoof Arch and again on Aug. 13, 1997, at the Joint Trails
Needles District. He used wood from within the park to start the
two fires, he said.<P>
According to prosecutors, in November 2000 Fatali sent an
e-mail message to members of the photography community
apologizing for what happened, saying he "seriously regretted"
the incident. "I simply screwed up," the message said.<P>
Defense attorney Kristine Rogers declined to comment
Friday, saying Fatali would make a statement after his Feb. 1,
2002, sentencing hearing.<P>
Assistant U.S. Attorney Wayne Dance said Fatali fully
acknowledged his criminal conduct by pleading guilty to all
seven counts as charged.<P>
"It's a matter that's very serious," Dance said. "All of our
national parks are for the enjoyment of future generations."
<BR>
Strange Looking Pictures Made With Nikon 300M Lens
in Large Format
Posted
I had a focussing problem with a 300mm lens with symptoms
similar to yours until I realized I had forgotten to remove the
anti-rotation screw on the lens, preventing it from resting flat
against the lensboard. But this wouldn't explain the ghost
images ...