Konica Hexar RF Discussions (and a link) in Leica and Rangefinders Posted June 27, 2000 " Autowind doesn't change what winding does. There is no real "control" aspect with autowind. I don't choose to wind or not wind film, I have to do it to get to the next frame." <p> The point (to me at least) is that, besides silent winding, with a Leica you also have control over WHEN you do the winding - when you press the shutter on a Hexar RF you get the film winding noise after the shutter release whether you like it or not. The same goes for film rewinding. Canon thought about this when they made the Eos RT (fixed pellicle mirror) several years ago, and added a custom function which let you delay the film winding until you released the shutter button after the exposure. As long as the Konica designers couldn't put a silent winder into the Hexar RF they should at least have thought of something like this. The Hexar RF seems to me to miss the point, not by much, but still by enough decibels for me to get a second-hand M6 instead. Ironically, as it was the news about the Hexar RF which gave me the impulse to go shopping for a rf this time. I have thouht about it for years but thought Leica too expensive, but after carefully testing it against the Hexar RF and Contax G2, a second-hand M6 seems the best choice. Even though the prices are silly and there are a lot to be desired about the camera, it's still the most inconspicuos and silent rf around - and that's the main reason I see for getting one apart from the optics, which I believe are overrated anyway. I noticed a change for the better when I traded my Olympus OM gear for Canon Eos and L optics, but seriously doubt if anyone can tell the difference between good Canon optics and Leica in a blind test. <p> But I may end up getting a 90 mm Hexanon; not the focal lens I use most of the time but at Konica's price I may still decide I can afford one. The photodo.com site even rates the Hexanon lenses over the comparable Leica's. As for the other focal lengths I have found Leica's lenses with tab's to be much easier to focus and will prefer Leica's own for this reason. But I feel pretty sure that both brands will deliver pictures that more than fulfils any serious picturemakers needs. After all, most rf pictures are taken under less than favourable conditions where the ability to hold the camera steady when exposing have greater impact on image sharpness than the quality of the optics. The Hexar RF was a nice try; in my opinion close but no cigar.
Konica Hexar RF Discussions (and a link)
in Leica and Rangefinders
Posted
" Autowind doesn't change what winding does. There is no real
"control" aspect with autowind. I don't choose to wind or not wind
film, I have to do it to get to the next frame."
<p>
The point (to me at least) is that, besides silent winding, with a
Leica you also have control over WHEN you do the winding -
when you press the shutter on a Hexar RF you get the film
winding noise after the shutter release whether you like it or not.
The same goes for film rewinding. Canon thought about this
when they made the Eos RT (fixed pellicle mirror) several years
ago, and added a custom function which let you delay the film
winding until you released the shutter button after the exposure.
As long as the Konica designers couldn't put a silent winder into
the Hexar RF they should at least have thought of something like
this. The Hexar RF seems to me to miss the point, not by much,
but still by enough decibels for me to get a second-hand M6
instead. Ironically, as it was the news about the Hexar RF which
gave me the impulse to go shopping for a rf this time. I have
thouht about it for years but thought Leica too expensive, but after
carefully testing it against the Hexar RF and Contax G2, a
second-hand M6 seems the best choice. Even though the prices
are silly and there are a lot to be desired about the camera, it's
still the most inconspicuos and silent rf around - and that's the
main reason I see for getting one apart from the optics, which I
believe are overrated anyway. I noticed a change for the better
when I traded my Olympus OM gear for Canon Eos and L optics,
but seriously doubt if anyone can tell the difference between
good Canon optics and Leica in a blind test.
<p>
But I may end up getting a 90 mm Hexanon; not the focal lens I
use most of the time but at Konica's price I may still decide I can
afford one. The photodo.com site even rates the Hexanon lenses
over the comparable Leica's. As for the other focal lengths I have
found Leica's lenses with tab's to be much easier to focus and
will prefer Leica's own for this reason. But I feel pretty sure that
both brands will deliver pictures that more than fulfils any
serious picturemakers needs. After all, most rf pictures are taken
under less than favourable conditions where the ability to hold
the camera steady when exposing have greater impact on image
sharpness than the quality of the optics. The Hexar RF was a
nice try; in my opinion close but no cigar.