Jump to content

kenneth_katz

Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by kenneth_katz

  1. I have taken photos of my 11 and 6 year old, and their cousins, for

    many years using bounce flash, and for the past two years, the

    lumiquest bouncer kit. In addition, I have shot just one roll with

    an Omnibounce attached to a 550EX.

     

    <p>

     

    The lumiquest set for ceiling bounce (80/20) produces results which

    are almost identical to straight bounce flash with a white index card

    attached to the back of the flash head (with a rubber band), so that

    some light is reflected forward to fill in shadows under the eyes.

    Index card and rubber band vs lumiquest and Velcro, you pick.

     

    <p>

     

    Using the lumiquest with white insert (no ceiling bounce, all light is

    reflected forward) produces results that looks like a softer version

    of straight flash. I would not recommend it for vertical format

    without taking the flash off the camera (and holding above the lens)

    , since the shadow behind the subject is even more obvious than with

    straight flash.

     

    <p>

     

    My experience with the omnibounce is more limited, though my

    preliminary view is that (a) when tilted, the results look like bounce

    flash with direct flash fill (not quit as soft as plain old bounce

    flash), and (b) when used without tilting, the results look more like

    a softer version of straight flash.

     

    <p>

     

    For indoor flash, I would also recommend setting the camera on manual,

    1/60 - 1/90 and F5.6 - F8.0, depending on film speed and your distance

    from the subject. (Always check for the green "exposure OK" light

    when using bounce). For fun, try setting the exposure at 2 - 3 stops

    underexposure for ambient(if the room ambient exposure is 1/8 at F4.0,

    then set at camera at 1/30 at f5.6). This should eliminate ghost

    images on your subjects and result in a more natural looking

    background.

     

    <p>

     

    Search photo.net Q & A using "stofen" and "lumiquest".

     

    <p>

     

    Hope this helps

  2. I currently use the self-timer (with the 2 second pre-fire MLU feature) when shooting landscapes on tripod. Based upon the instruction manual, it is unclear if the basic remote cord RS-60E3 supports the MLU feature or if I need the wireless RC-1?

     

    <p>

     

    If both do support the MLU feature, which is more convenient? I currently find myself forgetting that the self-timer is set and have handheld MLU exposures.

     

    <p>

     

    About how much do these accessories cost (not listed in B&H catalog)?

  3. For those of you who are interested, Canon USA has confirmed Bob

    Atkins answer on this matter. Even on Manual exposure, the fill flash

    reduction will occur, and the amount of reduction would be based upon

    the ambient light level seen by the camera at the time of exposure,

    not the EV level represented by the user's manual exposure setting.

  4. I am aware that when using fill flash, the Elan II will automatically reduce the fill ratio by as much as 1.5 stops [2.0 stops according to Canon] when the ambient exposure is in excess of EV 10. Does fill reduction still occur when the exposure mode is set to Manual?

     

    <p>

     

    There are times I wish I had CF16 like the EOS A2.

×
×
  • Create New...