Jump to content

bill_holtz

Members
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by bill_holtz

  1. I used R3s for about 15 years. I would point out:

    The meter needle is hard to read in dim light.

    The electronics are suspect (I was down to manual on both of mine).

    If the seals are old you will have light leaks (again, on both of

    mine).

    If you need diaopter lens for the viewfinder, they are hard to find.

    The shutter is limited to 1/1000th, but it is a good one.

    Over all, good camera. Wish mine still worked.

  2. Kenny

     

    <p>

     

    I use a 180/3.4 APO Telyt on a EOS-3, using the adapter from Stephen

    Gandy referenced by Andy Piper. All the comments given on function

    pretty much apply. It does work within limitations. I agree,

    however, that if you are in the market for both a camera and a lens,

    don't mix brands, you lose the best of both systems. In my

    situation, my R3 MOTs died and I didn't have a telephoto lens for my

    EOS-3. Now it not the time for me to make major photo purchases (two

    kids in college), so I went to the adapter to allow me to use a lens

    (a very good lens) that otherwise would have just sat on the shelf.

     

    <p>

     

    Bill

  3. John,

     

    <p>

     

    Sounds like you have made a decision, and that is good. However, I

    would strongly suggest that you actually look through a given finder

    before you buy. As responses indicate, the view is not the same for

    everyone. I have never bought a Leica M for one, and only one,

    reason. I can't come to grips with it's viewfinder. I can't see the

    35 lines in a .72 and I can't see the 50 lines in a .85. Maybe

    the .58 would entice me to join the club, but I won't buy one until I

    can test it myself. As a side note, the finder in the R8 is the best

    I have ever used. Hope you enjoy your Leica experience,

     

    <p>

     

    Bill

  4. Damond - May I ask where you will be going? Will you be on a photo-

    tour, a regular tour, or on your own? I have made several trips to

    China both as a member of a tour group and as a guest of my wife's

    family. I have found photography in China intoxicating but often

    frustrating. Asking me for advise on photography is a bit like

    hiring a lifetime .200 hitter to be a batting coach. But, I would

    offer some things to consider. Contrast in China can be brutal.

    With a tour group you will probably be eating during the best light.

    Smog or haze is common. On a cruise up the Yangtse I found that

    distant shots with my 180 APO Telyt turned to soup. Landscapes?

    Depends on where you go; China is a pretty dull country in many

    places. Nature photography with a Noctilux and a 35 lux? I think

    you will find these lenses more suited to street photography. And,

    outside a reserve or such, I haven't seen much wildlife in China. As

    for the WA, I concur with the advice given. I have used a 24 Elmarit-

    R and 15 Heliar. Zooms? It's a toss up. Not having to change

    lenses can be "very" bentfical. I have gravitated to an EOS-3 with a

    28-135 IS. But, I still take along my 180, usually a 80 lux, and a

    Contax G1 with a 28 Biogon and 45 Planar. Final comment, don't

    forget a portriat lens. Your Noctilux may work for you, but take

    something. IMHO, portraits are among the most available and

    rewarding photo opportunities in China.

     

    <p>

     

    Zhu ni hao yun. Zhao xiang cheng gong. (Wish you good luck. Sucess

    in taking pictures)

×
×
  • Create New...