Jump to content

shannon_hong3

Members
  • Posts

    14
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by shannon_hong3

  1. Hi Brandon,

     

    <p>

     

    No the N6000/F601m doesn't have spot metering and the built in flash

    -otherwise everthing else is the same as the F601/N6006.

     

    <p>

     

    U can find reviews here under the Nikon section.Scroll down - it's on

    the right.

     

    <p>

     

    www.techphoto.org

  2. Chuck,

     

    <p>

     

    There is an easy way around the problem of activating the metering on

    the F50(N50)/F60/F80 - it is just a micro switch located at the 7

    o'clock position beside the lens mount. The lenses have to be locked

    at the minimum aperture to activate metering I believe - a tab on the

    aperture ring depresses this microswitch when the aperture ring is

    set at the smallest aperture.

     

    <p>

     

    Just use a folded piece of paper to wedge it to the ON position or

    tape it down. I believe with a bit of creative thinking, one could

    fashion something out of a piece of wood or paper clip to hold the

    switch in the ON position.

     

    <p>

     

    Thus with the metering activated - I don't see why constant aperture

    lenses like mirror lenses could not be used with the cameras mentioned

    above. And why stop down metering could not be used with mf lenses on

    the F80 using DOF preview.

     

    <p>

     

    My $0.02

  3. This is bec with Nikon SLRs and lenses - the meter readings are taken

    with the aperture wide open(To provide a bright VF image) - there is

    no way of stopping down the aperture unless the camera has DOF preview

    .

     

    <p>

     

    While the new F80 has DOF preview, it is still uncertain if it will

    work with mf lenses that lack the electronic contacts of the AF lenses

    - the DOF preview function of the F80 might require electronic

    coupling with the lenses to work(I don't know - I'm just speculating)

    - it might be electronically activated. But if it doesn't need that -

    U should be able to perform stop down metering with the F80

  4. No - They won't fit a modern Canon unless U have a Leica Screw mount

    adaptor for yr EOS or FD mount Canon camera.

     

    <p>

     

    The lenses listed are old Leica Screw Mount lenses and will fit camera

    bodies that use that mount - e.g. Old Nikon, Canon, and Leica

    Rangefinders and the current production Cosina/Voightlander and

    Yashuhara RFs.

     

    <p>

     

    If they are in mint to excellent condition - they are worth quite a

    bit - check out ebay and the following site to find out a bit more

    about them and what they are worth today.

     

    <p>

     

    www.cameraquest.com

     

    <p>

     

    The site is run by Steve Gandy - He should be able to give U a better

    idea of what they are worth.

  5. Hi all,

     

    <p>

     

    I know the question I'm going to ask is weird - but will owners of this lens please tell me that if the sample I bought is ok.

     

    <p>

     

    I just purchased the 80-200 AFS over the weekend and I'm a bit concerned about the amt. of noise that it makes. It makes a 'swooshing' noise(about as loud as a whisper)that is quite perceptible in a quiet room - it also clicks softly when changing focus in Continous mode. Is this normal?

     

    <p>

     

    I don't expect it to be dead silent but it seems louder than other samples I've tried - although there were different factors at play when I tested the others (muzak in the bkgrd and high ambient noise). I can't and haven't tested mine with other samples side by side unfortunately. I've been told by a collegue that mine is only slightly louder than his USM L series lens but the same(noise wise) as his non-USM 80-200 L lens! But that doesn't help me.

     

    <p>

     

    TIA for any info.

  6. Diego,

     

    <p>

     

    U'll find that capacitors will behave that way once they have not been

    used in a while - the chemical(electrolyte) in them will dry out over

    time - just like a dry cell battery.

     

    <p>

     

    Sometimes, U can revive the capacitor by putting a charge though

    it(using it). Try recycling the flash several times - this may revive

    it. Otherwise, I believe Metz can replace the capacitor for a small

    cost - that is if U really want the CT5.

  7. Diego,

     

    <p>

     

    I own a 45 CT4 and one of collegues owns a 45 CL4 - I bought mine(used

    of course) after he did and I borrowed his manual. His 45 CL4 manual

    is actually a 45 CT4 manual with 2 additional pages. In fact the photo

    of the flash on cover is a 45 CT4. Metz didn't even bother taking pic

    of the 45 CL4 to replace it when they updated the flash/manual.

     

    <p>

     

    Differences?

    My CT4 uses a tiny red bulb to indicate that it is fully recycled

    while the CL4 uses a LED. The other difference CL4 also has an extra

    LED to indicate if the backgrd was under or overexposed(I'm a bit

    unsure of the details on this one - need to read the manual again).

     

    <p>

     

    My $0.02

     

    <p>

     

    P.S. I don't think the CT5 is worth the extra $$. The dedicated Metz

    rechargable NiCad batteries for the flash would be a better investment

    - cuts down on recycling dramatically.

  8. The differences bet the FM2n and FE2 are

     

    <p>

     

    1. Aperture Priority.

    2. TTL flash.

    3. AE lock.

    4. exposure compensation.

    5. electronic shutter.

     

    <p>

     

    Apart from the above - both cameras are almost identical.

     

    <p>

     

    FE2s are highly sought after on the used market and usu. go for more

    than their original price new. Perhaps keeping yr FM2 as a backup and

    getting a used N2000, N6000, N6006, N8008, N8008s or N90 as yr

    primary would be a better option.

  9. The RTSII is also out of production.

    I'd agree that investing in a totally new system(if U already have a

    large investment in one) would not be cost effective. The differences

    in optical quality bet the Nikkor and CZ lenses for most instances

    would be minimal.

×
×
  • Create New...