moosery

August 10, 2003

Very good clear pic, with a nice deep purple, something I like about velvia. Did it come out that colour on the film?

Amazing that you caught it that clear at that size. Indoors??

August 10, 2003

A wonderfully clear shot that could be better visualised at say, 1000x700ish pixels

August 10, 2003

The water has a stunning effect on the picture. Can I suggest posting a bit smaller? It's hard to see at this size..

August 10, 2003

Somehow the foreground image doesnt sit well with the background. Was it added later?

August 10, 2003

Fantastic lighting job - surely not by accident???

July 31, 2003

Having gotten my hands on a canon 9900F, a half decent scanner:-

April 3, 2003

I agree! Didn't even occur to me, but looks great. Thanks!

April 2, 2003

I know, it's awful. The original was wonderful, but...I can't afford a medium format scanner :o(

March 27, 2003

Thanks for the comment - vignetting? Huh? Oh..that. Yes, that'd be my scanner :o(

January 9, 2003

woah! this cat has issues!!! :o)

January 9, 2003

Major vignetting problem - filter too small??

-- would it (or any of your vignetted shots) lose much by being cropped? I usually would choose that route..best regards T

November 16, 2002

...that's the idea

November 13, 2002

I also like the composition, if somewhat adventurous! The water looks like liquid gold...I like it.

October 13, 2002

I think it's what's known as "oops"

October 13, 2002

I bet you're kicking that scanner by now - I know mine would let me down on a photo like this too..

October 13, 2002

I like how the colours come out. Only criticism? Maybe something in the foreground like the tree mostly out of the shot?

October 1, 2002

I went in a tunnel like this once in a boat...hmm...familiar... :o)

September 21, 2002

It's the striking colours and clarity that draw me to this shot. Red and blue work well imo...

September 21, 2002

The repeating patterns are intriguing. I've never seen that before! Well spotted!

September 21, 2002

Yes and no - I used a cokin light sunset (inverted so the grass was the "sunset"!) and a polariser. The rest was due to scanning..

August 26, 2002

As previous comments, I dont have any problems with the centering - I think that there's no reason not to, and it works.

But I do feel the pic should be straight. I've had a quick go (not exactly exhaustive) and I think that straightening the horizon gives a more interesting perspective somehow. End of the day, it's up to you, but if I was hanging a pic on my wall it would have to have a straight horizon I think...

August 14, 2002

....along with the silhouette of the buildings behind the illuminated smoke. Very nice. I do wish I could see a bit more to the right, though, but that's just being picky!

August 14, 2002

I've been a bit quiet because I had to dig out the original negative. The curiosity paid off, I managed to find the original and re-scan in some "toned down" colours. I think it's a bit better now :o)

That said - I am inclined to agree. The b/w version of the original is much more striking than either of the other two!

August 13, 2002

Do you know, I have absolutely no idea.

Actually, I'm really annoyed about the pic (taken with a digi point and shoot if you can believe it), because the film I shot the real photo on snapped and got destroyed.

Goes to show, use more than one camera! :o)

August 11, 2002

This is fascinating - I stared for ages trying to work out what it was...

Sign In

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

Downloads

Gallery

Store

Image Comments posted by moosery