joie_puckett
-
Posts
116 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by joie_puckett
-
-
Thanks Ellis. I wonder, are there no Kodak service centers that still support/service/clean the discontinued Pro Back?
-Joie
-
I have blown the ProBack sensor area with DustOff [as well as blowing
the lenses and the interior of the 555 body], without success in
ridding myself of the dust in the shots. I wonder if there's a better
technique that someone has used or a service someone may have used to
clean the system.
thanks in advance,
Joie
Here's what I've found that Kodak recommends for cleaning. Is there
anything more than this based on anyone's experience?
http://www.kodak.com/global/en/service/professional/tib/tib7031.jhtml?id=0.1.14.34.5.188&lc=en
-
http://www.botzilla.com/photo/strobeVolts.html
A site with a list of measured voltages from many strobes has answered my question.
SB-80DX ____ 4.23-4.29V, measured by Dave Tewksbury
I assume a reading less than 6v is safe for the pro back.
-
Hello,
Any idea if a pc-male-to-pc-male flash cord connected to the pro back
[mated to a 555ELD] would have any problems, voltage-wise, connecting
to any sb-80's?
thanks,
I've just acquired the 555/pro back and have several sb-80's already,
and don't want to destroy/fry the pro back.
thanks,
joie puckett
-
Count me as an Ellis fan. He is everywhere helping everyone, and he's helped me. He doesn't even know it.
-Joie Puckett
-
I have not been able to persuade Canto's Cumulus to archive the Nikon NEF file format. And as I use a D1X, this software [which was bundled with the D1X] is useless.
-
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<head>
<meta name="Author" content="joie puckett">
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="Mozilla/4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) [Netscape]">
</head>
<body>
<b>Photographer's comment #2</b><b></b>
<p>Wow, I really do appreciate the response. Especially from guys
with the same lens who've never had the problem.
<p>The D1X has no problem whatsoever with pixel bleed or jpeg migration.
The ghosting is there in the NEF file format [RAW file that the camera
creates with no compression whatsoever]. The information on the shot
is also recorded and the f/stop was indeed 1.4. The shutter speed
was high enough to stop the motion of the worker's heads, so I have ruled
out motion blur...
<p>The camera does NOT do this with other lenses. I have only had
this happen with this new lens.
<p>I am just looking to confirm that this lens ghosts on highlights/whites.
I say 'whites' because it softens on white areas of the images.
<p><b>I'm thinking this lens is just not sharp. Anyone else think
this as well, or have a contradictory story of a sharp 50mm 1.4 lens they
own?</b><b></b>
<p>-joie
</body>
</html>
-
Thanks so much for the response guys.
I can give you more information. I live at the beach and we have no air conditioning, so the environment isn't a factor. It was a normal day in Long Beach, CA... no extra-normal humidity, etc.....
Also, the shot was taken with a D1X and uploaded directly...
-joie
-
Hello,
I have this brand new 50mm 1.4 af-d lens [bought from adorama-usa
model] [made in china] that is giving me weird lens flare in an
otherwise normal shot.
overcast day, no sun, shot at 1/1250sec at 1.4. look at the weird
halos on the hats. I am not sure whether or not to return the lens.
I have heard that there are cheaply made 50mm nikon lenses out there,
thanks.
Beauty Dish
in Lighting Equipment
Posted
I think the weight of the dishes would kill [overwhelm] the lumedyne heads. I have the same question Robert, and would like to know, but doubt, that there's any dish out there for Lumedyne.
-Joie