koska

I think it's a nice step forward. I also agree with the posters who insisted that everyone who rates the photos should have at least one photo uploaded. For example, I get 20 ratings. 19 of them are eights , nines and tens. And then there is one user who rated my photo: aesthetics - 3, originality - 2. The first thing I would like to know is "is that man a good photographer?" Is he competent? Maybe the 19 other users were wrong rating my photo so highly. So I go to this guys page and see "no uploaded public photos". Further more I see that he has rated , let's say, 450 photos with average ratings of 4.53 aesthetics and 2.88 originality, and didn't make a single comment. What's the point of that kind of rating?