jeanne_hickey

<p>Thanks Sheldon, I checked it out. The Precision II was interpolated because the author said it could not achieve the resolution of the 949 or 848. This is still the best info I have gotten so far. It would be nice to see some kind of chart as well, although sometimes a picture is worth a thousand charts. Ah........I mean words.</p>

 

<p>I plan to purchase a previously owned Imacon Flextight Precision II or III.<br /> and would like to know a bit more about the model I'm getting, before I get it.<br /> I require it for scanning primarily 120mm color and B&W negs.<br /> Since they are discontinued, the information I'm looking for about them has been difficult to find.<br /> There seems to be a variety of models of the Flextight Precision II and III, like a 949, 848, 343, or 646.<br /> I have not been able as yet, to find descriptions of each one to compare them.<br /> The comparisons I have found on the web are between the Imacon and other makers,<br /> like Nikon or Epson, but not between the different models.<br /> Other than one being newer than another, is one Imacon model preferred over another and why, etc?<br /> This is confusing to someone who isn't familiar with these machines.<br /> Is there a gestation chart that will outline the time of manufacture and options of the different models?<br /> I would appreciate any information someone out there could offer to clarify this.<br /> I'm not looking for information regarding the newer Hasselblad X models.<br /> Thanks</p>

<p>I am traditionally a Hasselblad shooter. I have a number of awesome Hassy lenses and have recently purchased a Canon 7D, but haven't received it yet. Does anyone have experience with coupling a Hassy lens, for example a fisheye 30mm lens to a DSLR, aps-c (In my case, a Canon 7D)? My question is what the effective focal length would be of a medium format lens considering the .6 multiplier?<br>

I can figure the difference if it's a normal DSLR lens, but a medium format lens on a 35mm body confuses me.<br>

Thanks</p>