lacey_smith4

November 23, 2003

great, and much more spider like than the cartoon/movie version.

November 22, 2003

skillfully arraned, wonderful. I like even the crease of her dress angled directly at the jumper (as her body lines are) -- and her impatient, "don't bother me" look. I think it extraordinary.

June 4, 2003

whilst hundreds mill around below

February 7, 2003

Cambridge, your fair city, harvard square. two involved, on out of

sync, one lost.

September 20, 2002

looks like you should be booked for drowning her in a tar pit. Interesting, though -- I did need the title to interpret.

September 17, 2002

the head angle and softness (not to praise technique, unless on purpose) ends up a 19th century Cameron shot.

June 25, 2002

I like the composition, with the lower right to upper left flow. The graduated filter (I suppose) effect seems a bit strong? with too much loss of tower top detail.

June 9, 2002

Nice. Did you do a fair amount of dodging/burning?

June 9, 2002

softent he reflection/galre on Texas, and it will be there. I like the composition, and most the lightinh\g

June 9, 2002

a weird photo of a hand, for sure

April 17, 2002

I would say I know that tree -- except the one I know is too far away for this perspective-- part of the soothing universality here. The broken circle adds the connection to the rest of the universe, perhaps, though suggests serenity about to be rocked (slightly). Good.

April 13, 2002

very pleasing and serene

March 12, 2002

yes, I like the whole thing. I wish you had been a second earlier, and not had the background post on the left.

March 10, 2002

I'm not sure how to rate these. But, in each of your three folders, I see two distinct types, even for the same girl. One, a picture that looks like the person, nadother that looks like the pose you instructed. almsot without exception, I thin hte causal, non-forced pose looks better. In the series of 7 of the same girl (whichever series includes "dangerous"), a mid trio -- either the 3,4,5 or (I think) the 4,5,6 in the series is very good. It is in the genuiineness of the facial look (even those at least one is a directed pose).

March 8, 2002

I must say on ths tpe shot I usually lose myself in the ryhtym, color, pattern. But this one, probably because I first noted the lower left pattern, I see as a sea of faces looking right, and I can't shake that once I felt it. Don't know if that is emotional, counter-art, juvenile, or human. Talk about seeing things in lcouds...