chris_myers2

Susan,

More than likely the hair is on the mirror. That would account for why it doesn't show up

on the image and why you can see if looking through the viewfinder. It could also be

against the viewfinder itself but most likely it's on the mirror.

Best.

Janet,

I can only speak from issues I've heard (and seen personally) from a friends D70. His had horrendous back-focusing issues (to the point of selling the D70 and buying a 20D. Personally, I use a Fuji S2 Pro and it works quite well (focusing could be a bit faster and I don't like the N80 body except for the screw-in cable release).

You asked about the 28-105 though I can definately say that this is a very good lense, even if it's not an "ED" version. I've used this for many photo shoots and it does it's job well.

Best.

Paul,

<br>

You said all you used was the standard references that came with the gray

balancer. That works find and as intended as long as you live outside the US

or Canada. That's the reason for having to use the Kodak gray reference and

the reason for the previous poster's response.

<br>

Chris

The 2200 does have SOME metamerism on the glossy, semi-gloss, and luster

papers (and any of paper of this type).

Metamerism is virtually eliminated on the matte papers (which also have a

greater longevity than the others anyway)

I sold off my Canon equipment and went to Nikon for this reason.

My main body had been an EOS 3 and found it just horrible when I wore my

glasses. I can't do contacts all that well so that mode was out and figured why

should I have to get contacts to see through the viewfinder anyway.<br>

My Nikon F5 now is clear and bright when I wear my glasses. My Fuji S2

digital body is the same and it's based on an N80.<br>