Jump to content

picture_this

Members
  • Posts

    37
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Image Comments posted by picture_this

  1. You need a tripod for this sort of shot. Your meter is too smart for its own good. You probably could cut back on the exposure a bit. Stopping down the lens (not sure if that camera is capable) will let you modify the size of the light.

    Saying good-by

          144
    As a dog owner who lost a beloved animal a year ago, the context of this image is unmistakeable even without the caption. I was troubled taking a photograph of my dog's last day, but did anyway. In the end I am glad I did, though it makes me sad everytime I look at it. I'm sure you will be able to look to this photograph for many years to come to remind you of how much she meant to you.
  2. Theatre shots are always challenging. I usually do this kind of thing on a monopod to remove shake on my end of the lens. You probably could have given up some on the overall brightness, increased the shutter speed a bit to freeze things more (dial in some -ve compensation) and concentrated on getting her face well exposed. I also usually do a bit of PS work to help deal with the noise from the high ISO. I have an example of a similar situation here where I blurred some of the darker bits of the skin and the bottom part of the costume to reduce the effect of the high gain.

    Dancer

    Peek-a-boo

          3

    I really like the composition on this one. It's too bad there was some movement. You didn't indicate the ISO you used. I like to wind the ISO up as high as reasonable to avoid the movement. You should be able to easily get away with 400 and possibly 800. Also, I would prefer the focus on the front knuckles. Another preference of mine is a bit more contrast. I've attached a sample.

    4548414.jpg
  3. I like the zoom technique. Did you use rear sync? It might help if the flash had a more soft light, perhaps higher off the camera. Hold a large reflector over your head angled down at your subject, point the flash straight up. You'll need help if you also want to zoom, however. You can get bounce hoods that mount right on your flash so you can go solo. A large light relative to your subject will always give your a nicer light.
  4. Did you have a tripod. The sharpness is not great. It is a nice shot, but having the highlights blown out like this is a real problem. You would probably be better underexposing to prevent the highlight problem then making corrections as necessary. Better yet, do this at a time when there is not this volume of sun. For the composition, I would lose the photographer on the left and have the waterfall coming down the image from left to right. This might also help with the highlight problem. I made a few mods to change the contrast and sharpness and cropped one. It also might be helpful for you to post your technical details (camera, lens, etc.).

     

    Russ

    4321018.jpg

    Untitled

          71
    The "regular" approach looks like something more likely destined for a study of the animal. Nice shot, but it suffers from a lack of depth of field. This one however is an exceptional shot. It has a feeling more appropriate to a gallery rather than a book. I too lament the lack of detail in the animals, but the tone is nice. It gives it a feeling of being taken with actual BW film.
  5. More DOF would have been good, but it looks like you were using available light. Failing that you might have considered focusing on the face. The low angle seems to help to get the point across.

    35ai17

          1
    This is the best of the bunch. I find it helps in this situation to use fill flash. It is a relatively easy way to eliminate the shadows around the eyes.
×
×
  • Create New...