Jump to content

neil_johnstone

Members
  • Posts

    19
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by neil_johnstone

  1. I have just recived one and I'm impressed. I've also used a Panasonic LX1, the DLux3 has a much better LCD display (more natural colours) and, on what little use I've had so far, the output is different from the LX1, supporting what people have said about different firmware.

     

    I used the LX1 on holiday in summer when you couldn't carry anything on to flights and have been quite impressed. No, it doesn't give the same definition as slide film in a T3 (which is what I would have taken if I could have flown with film), but it is acceptable, especially with the 16:9 ratio.

     

    As a compact, lightweight camera, I think that it's hard to beat (16:9, RAW, useful lens range). But it would be nice if it took AA batteries!

  2. I've used Benbo and Uniloc tripods for years (both the full-size and the 'Trekker' versions. However, I have now moved to a Gitzo CF Explorer with an Acratech head, which is an extremely good combination.

     

    Nothing wrong with the Benbo/Uniloc design, but the Explorer packs to a much more convenient shape to strap to a rucsac, is a lot lighter without sacrificing stability and the CF is more comfortable in cold weather. The disadvantage of the Explorer is that I'd not be as happy with the legs in water - which is never a problem with the Benbo.

  3. For use in mountains, I've gone for the 80-200. The weight is comparable to carrying a 90/180 pair, but the real benefit is in not having to change lenses in awkward situations. The 70-180 APO is not a lens I'd choose to carry, or to use hand held. I have not found f4 a limitation with Kodachrome64.

    The 80-200 benefits from a tripod collar, either a modified STA-1 or the Burzynski one (which comes with a built-in ARCA type plate).

    It look me a long time to accept zooms, but now I'm converted!

  4. I use a 'normal' camera bag (CCS/Lowe/Kinesis pouches), so that everything is easy to carry away from the bike, carried in a Carradice saddlebag on the bike. Carradice now make an easy to remove attachment to allow instant removal of the saddlebag, if you want that option instead of removing the contents. With a suspension seatpost, vibration is reduced to the minimum (although with the camera gear inside a padded pouch, I'm not convinced that vibration on a pedal bike is a major issue - I've been over some very rough tracks (Iceland) with no problems).

     

    Those who suggest carrying on your body have evidently never cycled long distances!

  5. I agree with the Gitzo 1127 with Leica B+S head, but also look at the Novoflex mini Magic Ball. I use both for travelling with lenses up to 180mm (and also with a 2x convertor), with excellent results.

    I have also shortened the centre column, as there is too much movement with it extended.

    The 1127 will hold heavier loads (I've used it with an 8lb camera and lens combination), but I'm not so happy with this. Long lenses need heavy tripods!

×
×
  • Create New...