edroper
-
Posts
257 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by edroper
-
-
When it comes to model releases, how "identifiable" does somebody have to be?
Can somebody argue against a picture of their silhouette? Or does their face
have to be visible?
For example, please see this photo of a fisherman :
http://www.photo.net/photo/5051525
I dont have a model release of this guy. Can this guy argue that he's
identifiable because you can tell he's skinny, wears glasses, and goes fishing
at this particular public park?
I ask this because I actually have another picture of this very person which I
wouldn't mind adding to my images that I'd sell. But this person was
photographed near where I live so the chances of them bumping into me, while
slight, are still there.
What would you recommend in this situation?
-
What printer are you using to send out to ? Some print providers color correct on their own, some will give you profiles from their printer , and some wont touch it at all if you tell them not to color correct.
Personally, I use MPIX, and even though they use sRGB, I still have them color correct and Ive been pleased with the results. They have years of experience doing this stuff. I have 2 years. I trust their judgement better than my own ( and im color blind to boot... )
-
Hey,
I calibrated my monitor with a ColorVision Spyder 2 express last night.
Everything looks sooper on my monitor. However, something appears to be off in
my workflow.
I open a NEF file in Nikon Capture, and make sure I'm using the sRGB color space
in the color management options block. I export to Photoshop Elements 5.0 ( the
latest version ), which is also running in sRGB. And when I go hit "Save For
Web", I get the results you see in the below image. This is a side by side
comparison of the image in the editor, and then in the save for web preview
window. Whats going on here?
If I look at Image >> Conver To Color Profile , the sRGB is already selected as
well. So as far as I can tell everything in the workflow is working in sRGB.
....Now heres the weird thing. On a whim, I set Nikon Capture to use the profile
created by the colorvision spyder. I then export to Photoshop, and dont do any
converting to any color space, and if I save for web that way, it looks fine.
But I'm under the impression this isn't what I'm supposed to be doing, is it?
-
Sweet! thanks for the info Jammer
-
Those bastards! I just bought PSE5 2 weeks ago for 99. GRRRRRRrrr!
-
Wow. Flash. Just the name alone gets under my skin.
Flash is great for web sites catering to people with ADHD, or some other non-art related web site.
But when it comes to photos, let them speak for themselves and leave the flash to the other guys. This website was painful to try to sit through, when all I wanted to do was quickly look at your work.
If I was looking to hire somebody, I wouldn't based on this web site.
-
-
Welcome to the Internet.
resellerratings.com if you wish to check out the credibility of a particular company.
And for used stuff, I just stick with KEH.
-
Perhaps you should start posting your work and accepting and learning from critiques.
You may be in for a big disappointment, because for all you know you may find found out your work is not as good as you think it is when you go to try to get somebody to hire you, after only shooting for 6 months like you say you have been.
-
Oh no, not at all. I was just mentioning that as an advantage. However, if you make changes to the NEF with Capture, you can save those changes with no additional cost in the size of the images.
With Adobe, I believe you aren't modifying the NEF, but instead importing it and then saving it as a PSD or TIFF or whatever you choose. But when you do that, you can wind up with a larger file than what you had originally in the NEF
-
I've tried Capture NX, and instead purchased Capture 4.0 ( the older version ) . I've used Capture extensively before, and I just didn't like the newer interface to NX.
Now, from what I understand Capture is miles above anything else when it comes to handle NEF files. However, I must admit I havent used anybody elses products. But I've done extensive research ( and believe me, I'm the guy who nerds out for hours at a time researching something ) and everything recommends using Capture or perhaps another commercial product, above anything that might be considered "free". From what I gather Capture does a much better job than Adobe Camera RAW.
I like Capture because it provides a lot of functionality, that Adobe Photoshop Elements does not provide, in a non-destructive manner. I like its BW conversion functionality. Curves, tone compensation, etc. All of this can be done, without effecting the original raw file. I do 80% of my adjustments in Capture and then export to photoshop.
If you wanna try Capture 4.0 its still available for 30 day evaluation, as well as purchase. For me it was $99 well spent
-
Yes, I can attest to the fact that the nikon d1 is a horrible, horrible camera, as witnessed by these god awful images in this folder:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=436864
Terrible, terrible camera. Don't bother at all. Instead spend lots and lots of money on the newest camera on the block with all the fancy buzzwords. Do it. It'll make you a better photographer.
-
Oh man, welcome to the downfall of camera stores.
Thanks to the internet, we have a great BS detector for this stuff.
I was told one time by a store that the nikon 80-200 AF-D f2.8 was "easily $3,000". Yea, the same lens that sat in a store down the street from this one for $800. This guy then proceeded to try to sell me a sigma soom that cost around $150. I kid you not. This store went out of business 2 years later.
Heres the sad part... I wanted to buy the $800 lens from the mom & pop store, but this guy was being a dork about it. Some of these old guys who run camera stores dont realize that they cant keep BS'ing people if they want to keep in business. In the past 3 years, about 3 stores have gone out of business. All were run by "old timers" who had tons of used manual focus stuff, gave you additude or ignored you, and would grumble when you asked about something new. Its a shame really.
-
It's cool man. If it wasn't for dinosaurs we wouldn't have any oil.
Anyway, if you want a good viewfinder in a digital camera, look into a d1x. it has the pro level features you'ld like, a nice huge viewfinder, and still can compete with the newer cameras in terms of quality of images.
-
Wow, thanks Joshua for all the good information. Makes my winter prospects not seem to bleak :)
-
"Winter" has always been a difficult photo season for me. I just moved to South
Eastern Pennsylvania from Coastal Virginia, so during the winter down there I
always had the beach to rely on for photographic subjects.
Now that most of the leaves have dropped here inland in the hills of PA, I'm
wondering what to focus on during the winter here. Supposedly it snows, but that
doesnt happen too often.
So what I'm looking for is some advice or suggestions, of how to keep the
lanscape & nature creative juices flowing in the barren and dry winter season of
the northeast. Anybody have any suggestions?
-
http://www.photo.net/learn/portraits/
lots of good info there to start.
since your post is kind of vague, cant really give you any more advice. this 'session' doesnt go into any specifics. where is it going on? what lens, lighting, etc. will you be using.
-
Personally I think you should save your money. If you are going to be working in the actual print house that sells the stock photos, ya, you might need CS.
For most adjustments ( including curves in PSE5 ) , elements can handle it.
I've been using PSE5 for a bit now, and am pretty happy with it. With the money I'm saving ( on features i dont reall need ), I'm going to invest in a colorvision spyder to calibrate my monitor.
Also when you figure most print houses like to twiddle with images you send them on their own, your needs wont be that great. Apply an ICC profile, email, and go back to shooting.
-
You can use a D1X to drive a nail into a D200. Don't sell out just for the hype over a new camera. The d1x's should last you to 100,000+ shutter actuations. Drive them into the ground and then switch...
-
Deffinately make external backups.
I dont want this to turn into a Dell flamewar, but I've had quite a few harddrives die early deaths inside of dells. Thats all Im saying..
-
My guess would be......talent.
Go spend $50,000 on camera equipment. You can still take crap pictures if you don't have a good eye.
-
I would like to stress that Newegg is deffinately reputable. This is an isolated incident, and sounds more like buyer error.
I've bought many times from Newegg, all my friends by from them, and everybody you talk to online recommends them.
For anybody else reading, dont let this scare you away from their web site for other things, such as computer components, which is what they specialize in.
Also, newegg has killer price on Kingston 1gig CF cards. In a week I plan on buying 4 of them for the price of 2 lexars
-
Maybe you're just in denial about your fat friends. Buy them some slim fast and all will be well...
-
This is a report flaw in the N80's from a while back. I had mine fixed under warranty in 2002. You might stand a chance of yelling at nikon, and getting them to fix it for free. People have had success getting Nikon to fix out of warranty cameras when its proven to be a prior issue, kind of like when you have a car that had a recall...
My Halloween Digital Darkroom Computer under 2000 USD
in The Digital Darkroom: Process, Technique & Printing
Posted
your only backup medium is the DVD drive?
Ouch.