Jump to content

peter.s

Members
  • Posts

    532
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral

Recent Profile Visitors

498 profile views
  1. Thanks, Mike. I appreciate that.
  2. My photo galleries are not available - neither under the old links photo.net/peter.s or from my PN home page. Can you update me on the ETA for the galleries to reappear? Thanks.

    1. Sandy Vongries

      Sandy Vongries

      They are still working on the galleries.  To see some of your images, double click on your avatar, then see my activity, scroll down the left column to images and click on that.  You may have to reload to see them, and some will be placeholders and not appear as yet.  I don't believe anyone will lose photos.

    2. peter.s
  3. Well communications was just one of my criticisms, but now you've made me curious. PN has my email address. I also have a PN "notifications" icon and a PN mail inbox. Any/all of these would seem like reasonable places for PN to notify users about pending changes. I didn't see info in any of these, although I do pay attention to these. So how were the communications made?
  4. True, I don't pay a lot of attention. Then again, I saw your note and replied in 4 days. So what does that say about communications, search engine problems, missing galleries, galleries going up and down like yo-yos etc? Would PN have been better migrated had I paid attention or is that a red herring? My verdict remains: amateur migration, cheered on by Polyannas saying "don't worry, be happy." Truth is I'm not worried. There are plenty of other sites. I enjoyed Photo.Net and some very talented photographers who used to be here. If PN eventually get it right (and I pay attention), I'll see if it's worth the time again. Meanwhile thanks for my 1-year badge in celebration for my being here since 2001 🙂
  5. Who knows. There's a blackhole playing roulette with our own photos. Same for me.
  6. One of the most botched migrations I've ever seen. No advance communication of the migration or what to expect during the migration; galleries taken up and down like a yo-yo; search capabilities not working; Google links not working; and I can't see my own photos or those of people I usually follow. Can't imagine that the advertisers or paying subscribers feel they're getting any value. Not sure what this will do for the future of photo.net, even if they do get it up and running.
  7. Thanks for the explanation, Franz. Very effective!
  8. Franz, this is great. Would you be willing to share how you did this? It's very original. Thanks, Peter.
  9. peter.s

    Shape Of Water

    Kamala, I love this series of yours. In particular I'm struck by the sharpness of detail and focus. So many photographers recently have gone with the fashion for slow exposures to give the waves a "milky" look. I much prefer your work. Lovely.
  10. Good that he's spoiled and even better that he talks to you, Marc. As for being weird, he's probably just being a regular cat - they're individuals and do their own thing.
  11. Marc, thanks. Very much appreciated, given the high quality of your own work. PS How's the new kitten?
  12. peter.s

    Ice rink

    Oh! This is lovely. I don't know how I missed it back in February, but a belated congratulations. Very well done.
  13. peter.s

    water under the bridge

    Wayne - I'm really enjoying your Manhattan gallery. And had a big chuckle over "geurilla photography". Too true! Best wishes.
×
×
  • Create New...