scooterzz
-
Posts
47 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Image Comments posted by scooterzz
-
-
Bicycle Bridge
-
Abandoned Silo
-
Webb House Staircase
-
Some of these were taken in NY, but most in Vermont...
-
I live just south of you, and this summer has been one Bermuda High after another; I'd be tempted to explain the haze by atmospherics rather than the Yashica TLR.
(I have a MAT124G)
-
This is one of those images that "on paper" shouldn't work. Oops. It does.
-
I have printed this image in a high contrast motif, and it does make the sky more profound. In the end, I decided to leave the overall gray effect because that's the look of the original scene; that leaden-gray New England sky which seems to arrive every November and depart around May.
-
Removing the "thing" (a bit of broken porch, IIRC) that intrudes from upper right does create a cleaner, simpler image - but I think it adds that little bit of interest that (for me, at least) makes the image.
I considered (and printed it both ways) cropping the "thing" and gray area at the bottom, and in the end decided to leave the image as-is.
-
What a palette. Delightful.
-
IMO, the darker oblong in the lower left of the image draws the eye unnecessarily. Terrific image, though.
-
It depends on whether we're talking about an actual opinion - or just these limited numerical ratings.
If we're talking solely about numerical ratings, then it's impossible for me to justify my rating of "it's worth a six" in the face of the photographer asserting that "it's worth an eight." What could I use as my justification? That it feels like a "six" to me?
An opinion, on the other hand, implies the making of an argument with respect to the image; that's quite a different matter. If I offer the opinion that the image suffers because of underexposure, the photographer might respond with a counter-argument and try to convince me that the effect was a desirable feature and enhances the photo.
But how can anything intelligent be structured around "It's worth a [number]?"
-
I'd have to agree with Mary Ball's comment. Who am I to "rate" an image when the photographer's own feelings about its merits are on record?
(I was going to cough up pretty good numbers, though...)
-
Interesting image. My only criticism is why the top 10% of the photo wasn't cropped out; my eye was immediately drawn to the blown-out highlight and diminished focus up there.
Snowfence
in Uncategorized
Posted