![](http://content.invisioncic.com/l323473/set_resources_2/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
kenneth_pai
-
Posts
3 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by kenneth_pai
-
-
I am coming back to my Rolleiflex but can no longer do my own
darkroom work due to chemical fumes.
So far I am limited to shooting 35mm using Rolleikin2, because all
the consumer type labs do not handle 120 film.
Does anyone know of a lab in the Seattle area (or mail order) that
develope 120 color film AND digitize the images?
I use Ofoto and Shutterfly for my 35mm work, but they do not accept
120 film.
Appreciate any advice or comments.
-
All these answers are good answers. But there is no perfect answer. I
have been baffled by the same question for years. I have an M6 TTL
with collapsible 50mm and an ASPH 35mm, both quite small but still
weighs like a brick in any pocket. And I don't want to be bothered
with a flash. So, I have tried a Rollie 35, an old Minox 35 (no
flash), a Pentax UC-1, and a cheap Fuji with dual focus lens as
a "second" camera. Image quality of the Minox is best but has no
rangefinder and only a detachable flash almost 2/3 the size of the
little camera. The Rollei tears the end of the film strip as it keeps
winding after you have reached the last frame and is hard to load.
The Pentax is great but the auto rewind sometimes kicks in at mid
roll, giving me a half exposed roll.
<p>
My opinion is, a pocketable second camera to you Leica M should
offer, in addition to small size and ease of use, a built-in FLASH!
<p>
My current solution? A Kodak digital! Why? All the features of a
film point-and-shoot and macro focusing, and gives me digital
pictures to supplement my Leica. Also it does not give me another set
of films that would confuse me after a trip.
<p>
What does everyone think--am I crazy?
<p>
Kenneth
120 film processing & digitizing labs in Seattle area?
in Medium Format
Posted