![](http://content.invisioncic.com/l323473/set_resources_2/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
fred_cale
-
Posts
2 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by fred_cale
-
-
I don't have any empirical reasons why I like the IIIg so much, but I
have given up using my M3 and sold my M6, and just got a second IIIg
body. I have the 28/5.6 and the 50/2.8. June the 18 I was up in
Ketchikan using the 2.8 to document a trip to a road construction
site. Very rewarding photo opportunity and very satisfying slides,
even in a driving rain. The diminuitive size of the IIIg is
important to me, and those two lenses make the camera even MORE
unobtrusive. I have a little gossen scout light meter that works
great with the Kodachrome 200 I always shoot, so instead of point and
shoot quality, I can bring real photos home. I have some old
Leicaflexes which are fantastic, but when you put one on you are
TOTALLY in the picture taking business. Even with the M and any lens
but a 35/2 and a hood, you have this projection emanating from your
chest. Probably not as big a deal as I'm making out, but with the LTM
you get a for real camera with a good shutter and a for real lens
with a good aperture and focus mechanism in a very small package.
Quite easy to make that argument for an M with the collapsible lens,
or the Voights, so a lot of my feeling is bound to be just personal
taste. Be that as it may, my own personal whiz wheel points straight
at that IIIg and my slides, for the moment anyway, are bearing that
out. I used to feel the same about my IIIf's: great fun and great
results, since I'm not in the test pattern shooting business and KC
200 is sorta grainy anyway, but That viewfinder on the g is SO
great. Well, blah, blah,blah, I know. I use these things a lot more
than I talk, I promise, and both the f and the g model just beg to be
used.
Use of rolleiflex TLR
in Medium Format
Posted