Untitled

As all the others saied : amazing, creative, original, personal, grabbing. ... Congrats!

Piet

Excellent image! Great finishing skill. 

H.H.

Super. Excellent. Real art. Congratulation.

"Photoshopped or not, this is simply amazing. Outstanding image."

This question is so irritating, and irrelevant, I can't get it.

In the film era, and generally in art, the technic or "how to"  was never a question. It was always, how the  art by itself  was good, or not good. Art is a manipulation of media, what ever the artist chosen to use, and  the available technic, to achieve the effect,  the artist wanted to use  to express itself  for the shake of an effect, message, mood,  and all this for the art.

This  question is, like asking Ansel Adams, or  anybody els of this era, film era, , if this  beautiful print, hanging  on the wall, was done in the darkroom or. ?!  Of-course, all the print in the darkroom vas manipulated  with the available maximum technical tools, the artist  had in hand for him, there. It is the same b.t. regardless of the technic, chemical or digital. Show me  the final work. All of  the photographs, gone through a process  to get exhibited, shown to you and me, regardless of darkroom technic or digital   technic. 

A wander if anybody ever wandered, what technic  was used for a beautiful graphic, etching, lithography, silkscreen, wood cat, gouache, etc., etc, pictures, printing, hanging on galleries walls (maybe on you home walls too.?)  for the visual enjoyment for you, and  many.  And you never question the technic  involved of the process, you just enjoyed the beautiful art work. And that's it.  If you asking this question, "photoshopped?" you are an amateur.

....agree with Bela 101%....aesthetical experience is unique and does not question.....