chris_hawkins 0 Posted August 30, 2002 What is the intent of the photo? It doesn't draw me in. It is a photo of a muscular woman. OK, now what? The lighting and pose don't strike me as beautiful, bold, unique, shocking, etc. I'm left feeling nothing. Link to comment
paul_norman_dicaire 0 Posted August 30, 2002 The veins in her hands are quite a contrast to her abdominal muscles. Was that the intent? The way the light strikes the tendon (?) on her inner left thigh bothers my eye. She has a good physique but IMHO, it is depicted in too masculine a way. Link to comment
julietray 0 Posted August 31, 2002 Very striking, but not exactly my cup of tea. I prefer a more typically feminine nude, I guess. As the photo was loading on my screen, I was waiting for the penis. But oops, no, it's a woman. And with this little pubic hair, it might as well be a kid. Nothing about this photo is sensual or erotic to me, and why else photograph her nude? Link to comment
thomas_t 0 Posted September 1, 2002 Seems some of the criticism with your photo revolves on the muscularity of the subject, the athleticism of which I actually appreciate. Some people prefer soft and others hard bodies ... I think it is a wonderfully captivating photo, nice tones and texture. I suspect the ever increasing and positive rise of women's athletics will bring a sea change in classically subjective standards of female beauty. Good work :) Link to comment
triblett_lungre_thurd 0 Posted September 3, 2002 now i know i'm just a simple country boy and am not as wordly as some of y'all. so please take that into cornsideration when i ask. what happened to that poor feller's penis? love, me Link to comment
earnest_wilson 0 Posted November 14, 2002 It looks like you took a page from Bitesnich. Pretty good. Link to comment
jimvanson 0 Posted November 24, 2002 Great, lighting, pose, tones, print...7's all around! Link to comment
laura2 0 Posted May 28, 2003 These remarks are scaring me. I like it personally. I'm not looking at pubic hair or for a penis or anything, but the tones look GREAT and the clarity is definitely a plus. 6/6 Link to comment
netizenk 0 Posted September 11, 2003 Awesome photo... I can understand guys being intimidated, but there's only one cure - get off your couches, get into the gym, and get in shape. Besides, she is pumped and ripped in this photo, and contrast adds to that appearance, I am sure she'd look much more feminine in a different lighting and if she skipped pumping iron before the shoot... Link to comment
yo1 0 Posted November 23, 2003 hey igor, i just saw this, your picture, at an phozo galery in linz austria yesterday...is that possible? hasselblad super circuit??? very beautiful indeed!!! Link to comment
beepy 0 Posted March 16, 2004 I'll use this pic to comment on your work as a whole - very well done. The black and white is rich even on my computer screen. The body of work is solid. Some striking images, unconventional approaches - coupled to the luscious tones. Thanks. Link to comment
Guest Guest Posted January 13, 2008 I don't understand others' criticisms. They seem to stem from the fact that they do not find this overly muscled woman sexually attractive or sensual. I would agree, she is quite unnatractive for a woman. But there's nothing actually wrong with the execution of the photo, it's a competent, if not a standout, shot. Link to comment
alokdas 0 Posted July 28, 2008 This is a very beautiful photograph. The beauty of this photo lies in it's approch. The intent is not to highlight curves which is obvious in female body but a bit different. I think the intention is to show contrast - of subject, form, pose, tonal quality etc. I like it as it is not a traditional"supposed-to-be" female nude photograph. What irritates is the tinge which could have done away with. Good execution... Link to comment
f_ph1 1 Posted May 25, 2010 It amazes me how people can come up with such utter b.s. just in order to have something to say. How can you not see the beauty of this figure as simply that? The form is exquisite, the execution of the image far beyond what most are able to pull off. The work of an artist, as opposed to the results of a technician. Link to comment
Guest Guest Posted January 23, 2011 fwiw I don't think all female nudes need to project "softness" or sexuality. Sometimes we can admire a photograph for itself, without labeling it or limiting it to our expectations. In this case, without referring to the subject, it's a beautiful photograph. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now