They Hardly Make Pasties Big Enough . . .

The caption speaks for itself. This photo is posted under 'nudes'

though she is not quite nude, to safeguard those who 'filter'

by 'nude/non-nude' categories (especially at work). This woman is

seen selling and modeling these 'pasties' as the Las Vegas Adult Expo

(porn convention) earlier this year. Your ratings and critiques are

invited and most welcome. If you rate harshly or very critically,

please submit a helpful and constructive comment. Please share your

superior photographic knowledge to help improve my photography.

Thanks! Enjoy (or at least be edified)! John

It is my goal to make almost every photo I contribute to Photo.net somewhat 'original' and at least 'interesting'.

It is unknown whether this woman is 'siliconized' given her obvious droop; if one views the color version, those lines in her breasts are veins, but that is not dispositive as 'boob jobs' involve placement of 'augmented material' (e.g., silicone, saline solution, etc.) in bags, inserted under the front of the breast at the bottom, which leaves a small scar which usually heals very well and almost is unnoticeable after a few months' time.

America has a large percentage of women with large breasts due to the well-fed status of its women and their tendency to seek boob jobs, especially for porn 'actresses'. Not so the same in many European/Eastern European countries, where strictly natural is the word of the day.

Men's minds (and eyes and heads) are programmed to respond to the size of a woman's breasts, probably because she proves herself thereby (in primal terms) more capable of caring for offspring, therefore making her more desirable for mating purposes to perpetuate the species. Man is not so far advanced (in terms of Darwinian evolution) to have bred out such tendencies.

Yet woman with small breasts and other pleasing attributes, though they do not always turn heads automatically, can be most pleasing. I found myself in the company of two young women today, one with a most outrageous bust -- enough for four women of average size, but small body, and another with a standard size bust and a slim and taller body, and the standard size bust woman was to me far more attractive, in part because to maintain a large bust also requires other parts of the body be well and/or overly fed, which can be a turnoff (to me) in strictly visual terms (both women were extremely nice people, each in her own way in terms of ability to relate to others and for general intelligence -- one was a lawyer to be and the other an artist of some talent).

Of course, women have long been told by men (or they have told men 'size does not matter' while experience in talking to them intimately suggests somewhat otherwise in general (not always specifically). On the other hand, except for some men who are hung up on 'large' and/or 'small' bust size, it seems men often are pleased with a woman who otherwise is pleasing and the bust size just is an 'add-on' and not a be-all and end-all.

Experience with a friend who had breast augmentation surgery with silicon showed that it had a poor long-term result. She turned heads in a sweater (pullover for you Deutschlanders), but in terms of personal comfort and 'naturalness' to the touch, silicon in her case turned out to be a loser. Eventually, her capsules (implants) ruptured and caused her great pain. Her breasts were 'hard to the touch' as she told me. (Warning to women who are considering the procedure -- plus men of experience usually easily can tell the difference between 'augmented' and 'natural', generally with 'natural' winning out.

But that's just one man's view, but one of some age and one who regularly photographs models, and often has long talks with them about their personal lives (with their enthusiastic willingness).

For what it's worth.

Thanks, Stafano, for commenting.

John (Crosley)