SUCCUBUS BEARING FLOWER

Comments and rates would be appreciated.

Looks more like a succubus to me. Must be a focus problem . . .

Glad you liked it as much as the rest of 'em.

Hang on . . .

Here's what I don't get: how can anyone rate this a 3 for originality, when I can safely say they've never seen the like of it on PN?

 

As to succubus/incubus, I vote for succubus, because the figures look female to me.

Thanks for the comment. I knew before I posted it for critique that I was going to get hammered, and, yet, I still get pissed off. Must be some serious masochistic tendencies here. Then I saw your comment, and, to be perfectly honest, I took it to mean you were saying it sucked (literally!) And, as you pointed out, there is virtually no point in having an aesthetic and originality rating, because it seems that about 90 percent of the Pnetters make no distinction.

 

And, you are of course correct that the model was female. The doll was not very anatomically precise, so there were no genitals, but based on the expanded chest area, I will give you that it is a female. Jesus, I was just going for a little poetic license. Bad enough I get pounded with 3/3 s and then get caught lying. Some days it doesn't pay to get up. Is there such a thing as suckubus?

Suckubus, no, unless you are into neologism. But succubus is the female form of incubus. Look THAT up in your Funk & Wagnalls.

Jeez, intellectuals are a pain in the butt! The titles shall be changed.

I love it!

Have not heard from you for awhile. Thanks for the comment and rate. It didn't exactly get raves from the Pnetters, but you can't win them all. To be honest, I liked it a lot too.

 

Hope all is well with you and yours.