erik skaar photography 0 Posted January 19, 2007 I whole-heartedly agree with George. It's almost as if the 3-3 rating is an obligatory one, regardless of the image being rated. It is a system without much merit. The use of shadow is very clever and the tonal and textural element of the skin is very sensual. Nicely done, Thomas. Link to comment
hrife 0 Posted January 19, 2007 A very unique approach....well executed. I had to look twice to fully appreciate. Very well done! As for the 3/3....may the fleas of a thousand camels....well....I won't go there out of respect for you. Link to comment
drache 0 Posted January 19, 2007 I aggree with the comments above. Very fine picture, I like it a lot. Fine!!! Link to comment
JPPhoto1664880217 5 Posted January 20, 2007 This one definitely qualifies as fine art! Congratulations! Link to comment
thomas_doering 0 Posted February 26, 2007 Thank you all for your comments. As for the 3/3 rating: It is blazing, that the anonymous ratings are significantly worse than the overall ratings. Maybe some 'old bulls' or professionals have a problem with me?! Obviously, I get one 3/3 rating for every of my photos. However, I don't mind. Regards, Thomas Link to comment
alberto_lema1 0 Posted July 28, 2007 Porque no es posible saber si lo real es la sombra, si lo real es lo objetivo. Es de tal caracteristica la composicion que no se sabe que es lo real, que cubre a que. Por lo tanto lo unico real es el deseo. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now