mclain swift 0 Posted September 15, 2006 As far as photography goes--nothing really special. As far as the subject-- what a beautiful pair of breasts. Link to comment
ron_h__portland_ 0 Posted September 17, 2006 Call me crazy, but I'd say she likes you! '-) Link to comment
darius.tulbure 0 Posted September 17, 2006 2 out of focus teats! 6/6 and 7/7. Photo.net... Link to comment
marcogiardini 0 Posted September 17, 2006 before rating this picture positively you have to pass on my died body. Sorry, i do not think is art. .oesse. Link to comment
iandangerfield 0 Posted September 17, 2006 Dear Marko, Interesting photo. All that can be said about this is ... "Nice tits!" Link to comment
chet_king2 0 Posted September 18, 2006 I agree, nice tits. The rest of this critique not only applies to this photo but to your entire portfolio. You obviously have a camera that takes decent photos, however, you exhibit no photographic ability other than being able to hold your camera fairly steady. CK Link to comment
samsen_samsen_la 0 Posted September 18, 2006 Well composed and executed. Only nag is for a tad of OOF far front field due to shallow DOF as seen on skin of left breast. Well done. Link to comment
kahkityoong 0 Posted September 18, 2006 The breasts which one would assume are the subject should at least be in better focus. Not a bad idea but better technique and lighting would yield a better result. Link to comment
Guest Guest Posted September 18, 2006 Without the title, the picture is just badly executed. With the title, it becomes a badly executed quite funny picture. Link to comment
realkuhl 0 Posted September 18, 2006 Nice Breasts is about the only thing nice. Are you really proud of your gallery ? I mean is this the type of photography that you want to be identified with ?? Breasts and a chick laying half naked on a bed ? Link to comment
ellis_vener_photography 9 Posted September 18, 2006 looking at this photo and then at his gallery is proof of something an art director once said to me: "Everyone can take one decent photo. The problem is that few people can take two and even fewer can take three." Link to comment
kent_tolley2 0 Posted September 18, 2006 I failed to find "one decent photo" in Marko's pics. Once again evidence PN viewers have some of the worst taste imaginable. What's next? Nudes on black velvet? Marko Next time, try a smaller f-stop. If you don't know what the aperture control is for, look it up. Link to comment
kahkityoong 0 Posted September 19, 2006 I don't think these breasts are all that great either. Link to comment
Guest Guest Posted September 20, 2006 Quite interesting, at this date, the score for anonymous ratings is A: 5,74, 0: 5,81. Direct ratings is A:3,83 O:4,17. That's a huge difference. Link to comment
Guest Guest Posted September 20, 2006 I have to agree, this is ridiculous and artistically deficient. Being a set of boobs can't make up for the fact that this is poorly photographed and composed. And even as boobs go these are probably better off back in the shirt. I'd recommend reading a book on photography and trying to use some elements besides the shutter button to capture your 'vision'. Link to comment
jgalyon 0 Posted May 5, 2007 would bet my life that the "photographer" is under thirty, wears his cap backwards, would list "skateboard technician" as his profession, and and still says "doood!" every other sentence. Link to comment
jgalyon 0 Posted May 5, 2007 the fact that the nipple on the left breast is hidden...maybe a statement, i.e., this is "art" ...not porn! Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now