nude cold as ice

comments very welcome;

preciosa foto, diferente, es dificil ver un desnudo diferente, y este lo es. Felicidades

hola..esto es logrado con edicion digital tipo photoshop?...como llegamos a eso?

hermoso trabajo.

very, very cool!

A great piece of art work. Can't say much about this. I can only admire it.

artistic!!!!!

Very original !

Both originality as aesthetics are simply excellent

excellent 7/7

What a creation. Just amazing. Great thinking and execution too. Lovely lovely shoot. If you don't mind, your original version, its very much artistic too.

This is too good ! Congrats!!

Superb, very well seen.Congrat.

lovely image with a funky pop art feel....with more to it than the original. cheers barry

original and fresh.

Pues me parece una foto muy original con perfecto acabadp tecnico, como un negativo en B/W. un cordial saludo Nikolai, PN. no seven,

Oh, this effect suits so well! Bravo!

And I like the original too :)

B:l:ana

what a good idea!!!

Nice work ... one question though .. how did you do that? Keep it up!

So nice!

What a great idea. Fantastic picture

Creative beyond imagination.

smart

am i the only one reminded of the iPod commercials?

 

beautiful picture.

neat shot, I think the effect is not very original as it probably took two clicks of the mouse

I usually never complain about people giving "bad" or exceptional ratings because everyone should feel free enough to rate according to his understanding of photography in a responsible an honest way,

BUT in your case I want to advise you that it (probably?!) does take more than those two clicks to get a clean result like this and even if it was the easy way you imagine, you are rating in NUDE section and not DIGITAL ALTERATIONS so you should consider to rate according to the criteria of the relating category which, referring to your biography >>I will rate images that are immoral with a low ratings as I do not feel that sin can hide in "art".<< seems to be rather problematic anyway for a unbiased accomplishment of rating in such a section;

in addition let me advise you that especially the motive of "sin" is one of the most present in art and philosophy (ever heard of dante alighieri, hieronimus bosch, eugene delacroix flashing in my mind as very typological examples) over all and due to new media and expression you should rather question things than accuse them to be "sinful".

You simply CANT JUDGE being biased !

I just want to tell you that I don't feel "attacked" in person but ( once again refering to your bio >I rate things knowing that everyone is at a different level in their photography and apologize if my standards are high. Simple things like focus and exposure need to be right at any level.< ) you should either reconceive the criteria of your "high standards", open your mind for a kind of photography you obviously fail to have the technical ( digital manipulation ) and "moral" skills and foundation to evaluate, or skip over to another section as your obstinate way of rating might extesively falisfy a document with less ratings ;( and as you can tell by the reponse on your site, some people really feel irritaded by your ratings !! )

I don't want to be rude so if this sounds like that, it might be that my english-skills just don't suffice to transfer my opinion in a more polite way;

at last I want to impute you commenting on this picture even in your very sarcastic and rather destructive way; maybe you could enlighten us nonpros with some of your experience and constructive advise instead.(refering to your bio for an end of this :

quote :If you have a question, just ask. Todd Kuhns;

best regards nj