jo7hs2 0 Posted December 31, 2005 For some reason I like this underexposed (intentional) shot. It is underexposed because I was fiddling with the shutter to see how far it is off. It is slow by about 1/2 to 1 stop, but not reliably. Somebody needs a CLA. Link to comment
stephen hazelton 3 Posted January 2, 2006 I think better exposure (or maybe scanning) would improve the shot, myself. You've also run into that bane of waterfall photographers, the Ugly Log. (The other bane is the Multitude of Tourists, which you avoided here!). Only solution I found to that was photograph small waterfalls close up. In this case, it looks like you might could have gotten up past the log in question. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now