nsfbr 0 Posted December 30, 2005 This shot was hand held, at 1.3 seconds, hence the slight wiggle of the non moving parts. The part at lower right is another ride and its inclusion is intentional. I like this photo a lot, but I'm also interested in what folks around here think. Link to comment
john_rice3 0 Posted December 30, 2005 I think the image would be only better if you removed the small background feature in the right lower quadrant. It distracts from the ephemeral aspect of the main subject. Link to comment
nsfbr 0 Posted December 31, 2005 John - When I posted this at my former home on the internet, I got a few comments along the same lines, so you are not alone in that thought. That's why I included the mention of its intentional inclusion in the description. Perhaps, I should take this comment to heart...that regardless of my intent, it is distracting to some. Thanks for the comment! Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now