hiro_aki 0 Posted August 20, 2005 The sky is very beautiful. The water surface has too much texture, I think. The moon and the planet are as bright as ordinary sunlit objects so usual long exposure would over expose them. You might wanna use GND or composite of two pictures, one with this exposure and the other with longer exposure. Link to comment
sunapeephoto 0 Posted August 20, 2005 Thank you Hiro for your comment and hopefully you will respond back as I am not sure what you mean by too much texture in the water. Is it too grainy? Also wouldn't a longer exposure make the moon even more a blur than it is? This was 1/60th of a second and I believe that you can detect movement in the moon at slower than 1/125th speeds? Link to comment
hiro_aki 0 Posted August 20, 2005 What I meant by texture is the waves. I thought it might be more interesting or nicer if you expose this very long time, say nearly 30sec and smooth out the water surface. In that way, I suspect that the color of the sky would be interestingly reflected on the water surface, too. But of course, if you do that, you would over expose the moon and the planet. That's why I suggested GND or composite. The GND suggestion was a mistake, as you noticed, because the motion of the earth would be the problem. Sorry for the confusion. At this magnification, I think it's ok with 1/15sec so that the moon and the planet woudln't be apparantly blurred. By the way, I just noticed the ratings of this picture is very low! I don't understand. Please don't be discouraged, John. I really think this is a beautiful picture. Link to comment
sunapeephoto 0 Posted August 21, 2005 Thank you for the clarification Hiro. I really hadn't looked at the waves as a disturbance, because this is a scene I return to shoot so frequently that it can become mundane. I wouldn't have pulled my camera out except for the presence of the moon and planet so soon after sunset and I was expecting so little from the shot that I didn't even bother to set up my tri-pod. Had I done that I would have tried some slower exposures. Thank you for reminding me to look at those things that arecommon for me as new to somebody else. I need to be more tuned to my possible audience. I don't understand the ratings on this either. I much prefer to have one comment versus any number of ratings anyway, so thank you for your comment. John. Link to comment
peter_daalder 0 Posted September 3, 2005 Adjusted levels, 20% motion blur on water and played with curves.I think this is a very attractive scene, John. It was a pleasure playing around with it - hope you don't mind. I just thought that Hiro was on to something and it was worth having a look at...Cheers, Link to comment
sunapeephoto 0 Posted September 16, 2005 Hi Pete, thanks for messing around with photo. I don't seem to have the eye/talent/technique to make a photo pleasing on Photo.net. Your version of the image pops. Whenever I try to alter my photos, I get hung up on the way it actually appeared and make poor decisions about changes. Hope you've weathered your winter well. It is just about over, which makes me depressed because it means my winter is just about to start. Though I do like autumn for photography. Thanks again. John. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now