timschultz 0 Posted June 22, 2005 Nice photo, Robert--it's a great panorama, but I think there is too much dark sky in the shot, which might be improved by cropping into even more of a panorama. The clouds don't offer enough definition or relief to be interesting in and of themselves, so I find them overwhelming the image. I know you're trying to capture the storm. Link to comment
robertbrown 1 Posted June 22, 2005 Tim, I tried cropping this three ways: lots of dark clouds (version shown), lots of water, and thin panorama. For today, I liked the one I posted for critique best, though that could change tomorrow! Thanks for your input. Link to comment
Guest Guest Posted June 22, 2005 Wonderful. grat grey scale. superb mood too! B:l:ana Link to comment
cl5 0 Posted June 22, 2005 Aesthetically beautiful with a great mood. Congratulations! Link to comment
atkphotoworks 0 Posted June 22, 2005 Robert I think I like the original without the crop as well. Although the second crop adds some balance, I still prefer the original. Dark and moody feel. Link to comment
leighperry 0 Posted June 22, 2005 I prefer the original framing to the leaner crop, Robert. I conveys more of a sense of expansiveness. The clouds textures are unusual -- because of the cloudbursts they look almost posterised but I'm sure it would all come together in a large print, which this definitely deserves :) Link to comment
Guest Guest Posted June 23, 2005 In my own taste, I prefer your original shot Robert. The cropped version in a panoramic way is very nice but I like the dark part of side on yours. It gives a good view to the storm.Excellent black and white, with a complete grey scale ! Link to comment
AaronFalkenberg 0 Posted June 23, 2005 Terrific shot! Gald to see the trip paid off, photographically speaking. cheers, Aaron Link to comment
AaronFalkenberg 0 Posted June 26, 2005 As luck would have it, I just came across Adam's rendition of the Lake. I wonder what he say about this??? Link to comment
AaronFalkenberg 0 Posted June 26, 2005 Ooops, that should have been "Adams'", with the apostrophe after the "s." cheers, Aaron Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now