Jump to content

The Grand canal under a cloudy sky


henrimanguy

Change of the sky and adjustment of levels, colours, contrasts.


From the category:

Landscape

· 290,379 images
  • 290,379 images
  • 1,000,006 image comments


Recommended Comments

Another resubmission (with the risk to weary you). This time of a

photo which was rather appreciated but for which I have received much

critics and advices for improve it. That is what I have try to do. To

my own judgment it seems better. Is it your opinion ? (And after

that, I will finish with Venice).

Link to comment

Thank you all for your comments and ratings. I see that, even if it is improved, the kind of sky takes a great part in the impact of a photo if I compare the ratings of this one to those of the previous version, the sky of which is more impressive than this one.

 

Hello Colin, I have looked for your similar shot in your portfolio but I have'nt found it. I would like that you show it (yet, a shot from the same spot is not surprising. I think there is millions shots taken from this point).

 

Hello Alberto! Nice to hear you again, and thank you for your comment.

 

There is something in this photo I thought there would be some questions about, but surprisingly there is no one. Even though I will answer to it. If some of you have noticed the two luminous spots in the distance on the left, these are a spotlight and a diffuser for the shooting of a film about Casanova which took place at this time.

Link to comment
As I was fairly harsh on the first version, best to comment on the resubmission. The sky is much more in keeping both in scale and colour temp. The overall levels are better. The composition is still nice but it's still very oversharpened. Nice shot thought, which is harder than it looks (I know, i've taken the same shot)
Link to comment
Yes, this one looks less dramatic than the previous one, but more natural overall, good job
Link to comment
I passed from one image to other many times. It's rather hard to choose the one. They are really differents. This one is more "real". In any case - very good!
Link to comment

Thank you for all your kind comments which are very invaluable to me.

 

George, thank you for the Turner painting. I love very much the Turner's paintings. There was an exhibition of its Venice paintings when we were there but we have'nt take the time to see it and now I regret.

Link to comment
To be honest, I like your first submission better. It was a bit over done, but it certainly made it different from all the rest of the ?I stood on the bridge over the Grand Canal?. This is still above that category, but looks like an ordinary day.
Link to comment
Henri, I've just noticed you asked to see my shot from the Accademia bridge. Here it is. You will see the weather was fine and so the sky is a rather boring plain blue. Also the Salute side of the canal is in deep shadow. Your shot is much more interesting!
Link to comment

Very beautiful picture Henry.

Cloudy sky makes this photo more natural and brings the scenery in some unbelievable movement which is present to this place over the centuries.

Thanks for sharing - Krzysztof

Link to comment
It's a good thing you mention the added sky in the details - I see too many photos that I suspect are composites too but nothing is mentioned. I can't explain why but for me it makes a huge difference in my appreciation to know whether it was shot this way or composited afterwards. I'd rather see how it was when you were there than how it could have been. Perhaps it's not fair to write this comment about one of your photos because I see it's the only one of this kind in your portfolio. One technical note: this too (as with another photo I commented on) looks slightly oversharpened - at least on my monitor (but a monitor can't be too sharp, I guess)
Link to comment
Thank you Theo. In fact, this is not the only photo where I have changed the sky. There is some others, but I have not mentionned it each time. The reason why I have changed the sky here is that the real sky was uniformly greyish and absolutely without interest. I know that it can be considered as a cheating by some but I don't find it more a cheating than to use filters on the lens for example. The "falsification" of the reality has'nt been invented by the photoshop users. It is as old as the photography.

About the oversharpening, it is a problem that I have with many of my reductions for photo.net. I have long time compressed them with a big compression rate which damage very much the photo and seems to increase the sharpening.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...