dominikazielinska 0 Posted December 9, 2004 Would this be better if there hadn't been that much movement? Please tell me your thoughts... Link to comment
mandar kulkarni 0 Posted December 9, 2004 Its too bright to understand. The movement is also blurry. Link to comment
derek_prinsloo 0 Posted December 9, 2004 I'm assuming that this is a photo of a fire juggler? A friend of mine tried some similar shots: http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=423902 While his aren't perfect, I think: if you're going to have a long exposure, step back so that there's some context. Otherwise, go for the shorter exposure. That way you might catch a glimpse of the performer lit by the fire. Link to comment
dominikazielinska 0 Posted December 10, 2004 I have some other ones also - where I did have a shorter exposure on them - i'll try and post them this weekend :) A point to note is that these photos were taken prior to me having a tripod with as steady a hand as possible without one (didn't think of using a surface back then either - as a tripod that is!!)*I have posted some other ones up with a shorter exposure* Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now