peterbg 0 Posted July 8, 2001 i like it very much. very much indeed. good expression though your explanation made me feel uncomfortably voyeuristic. Link to comment
jheimsch 0 Posted July 8, 2001 You have chutzba my friend. Much braver than I. What would you have done had the gentleman awoken? Very nice photo. Link to comment
sherm 0 Posted July 8, 2001 I have to admit I'm a sucker for a good street photo, just the fact you usualy have to be quick and work with what you have. I love the contrast and balance. Good Job. Link to comment
akbar 0 Posted July 9, 2001 Have enjoyed browsing through your folder. Excellent composition. Love your dark rich tones. Link to comment
james___ 0 Posted July 10, 2001 Very nice image. Balls of steel. I love the richness of the tones and the detail in the shadows. Good image to print. James Link to comment
swade 0 Posted July 10, 2001 I wish I had the courage. It shouldn't be that hard (what's this guy going to do to you anyway?) but one still feels like an intruder. Excellent. Link to comment
Wayne Melia 6,000 Posted July 10, 2001 Nice tones and lines I like it and want to look more. Link to comment
eren_aktuglu 0 Posted July 13, 2001 Wonderful photo, using the diagonal is perfect here, framed face with the hand and the dark tones on this strong subject takes this pic to the top. Congrats. Link to comment
nick_s 0 Posted July 13, 2001 I like the picture as well, especially the diagonal composition. *Now for a really dumb question*. I notice a number of posts related to Chris' comments on how he took the photo. I know there are additional comments when going through the "critique" forum, but how do I see these same comments if I go through "top rated photos" or if I am viewing the portfolio of a photographer of interest (such as Chris here). In these instances, there are often explanatory notes which I would like to read, but am unable. What do I do? Sorry for taking up space here, but the number of posts referring to Chris' original comments compelled me to ask. Thanks in advance. Link to comment
andy_graham 0 Posted July 13, 2001 this is absolutely the best(imo) shot posted on photonet that i have seen so far...how?how?how?do you do this...this is the detail and composition and interesting subject and tonal range i strive for and fall so short of....have you printed this?how did it turn out?did you have to do much manipulation(post exposure)?sheesh!i am in awe..no!i am way past that...you took this with a 990?...i'll stop now before i embarrass myself,oops,too late.....good shot Link to comment
tony_dummett 0 Posted August 5, 2001 I don't think this is exploitative or even particularly confronting. It's kinda peaceful, actually. REALLY lovely composition and tonality. This is an image of a guy that's at peace with himself. On the "Brutal And Cynical Invasion of Privacy" scale I give this a "1". As a photograph, I rate it much higher. Link to comment
chris_battey 0 Posted August 26, 2001 Sleeping out in the open, this was an unplanned snap of a man asleep in the city. I generally no longer photograph the poor and unfortunate, however this portrait immediately presented itself, and so I took a Photograph. Link to comment
skip_scott 0 Posted August 26, 2001 Beautifully done and extremely powerful - a very involving photograph with excellent "exposure." You have re-created the finest in black and white portraiture WITH A DIGITAL CAMERA! I wouldn't have believed the richness from a digital camera. Thanks for the great photo. Link to comment
Guest Guest Posted October 11, 2001 How close did you sneak in for this one? I ask because it appears the image has been heavily cropped (thus the heavy grain-like structure), though I'm not familiar at all with digital film medium, just film emulsions, mostly Tri-X for B&W street work.Anyway, no biggie. Whatever the production process this is a very good picture, not taken by someone without photographic experience or sense for the scene.Hat's off! Link to comment
chris_battey 0 Posted November 26, 2001 Hey Tris, I actually added the film grain texture in Photoshop. A sort of tribute to the 70's and 80's use of Tri-x. The pic isn't cropped. Link to comment
ken_thalheimer 3,739 Posted November 26, 2001 Great face. Great detail. Great expression! Link to comment
einar_orn 0 Posted November 27, 2001 I wish people would stop (over) analysing and reading too much into photographs, diagonal this, digital that, it sometimes feels like they like to recite what they've seen in beginner textbooks. This really is one of the most interesting pictures I've seen on photo.net. Very powerful visual. A+ Link to comment
saucerman 0 Posted November 27, 2001 I agree with comment on over-analyzing. This is a beautiful documentary photo, born of a troubling social circumstance. Chris, I wonder if you have any aspirations for social commentary - your work could be deeply moving in a directed narrative. Link to comment
brad_farwell 0 Posted November 28, 2001 A beautiful photograph just on composition and tone, to say nothing of the subject. It reminds me of images of death-masks, and the feeling that the hand on the right is either holding up this image of the face or about to remove it is really fantastic. Big thumbs-up. I disagree with the "voyeurism" implication. I don't think there is any sense that you are taking advantage of this guy any more than taking a photograph of anyone else on the street is taking advantage of them (though there are folks who would say that is immoral too. I just disagree with them.) It seems to me a photograph and portrait first, and not some sort of squalid sensationalism. There is a tenderness in your approach, I think aided by the close range, that exalts rather than denigrades the subject. And heck, most folks I have photographed and then approached afterward and given a copy of the picture are very happy to have an image of themselves, that someone cared enough to take a picture. Link to comment
mg 0 Posted December 7, 2001 Nothing at all - that I can think of - could be improved... As for the problem raised here about shooting this person, I doubt that this is a crime, since what you are doing is enhancing the subject's Beauty... I wouldn't be surprised to hear that this person would like the shot as well... Maybe you should try to give him this picture... Another point I feel I want to make about this kind of people pictures... I've taken pictures of poor people in asia for 4 years from 1990 to 1995, and only 2 persons denied me the right to do so... Hundreds were actually very happy about it... It has got a lot to do, I believe, with how you feel when you take these pictures... Your feeling will be written on your face, and these people can read faces like no rich man can... Most of the time it resulted for me in great human encounters... Link to comment
can_not_delete_account 0 Posted December 11, 2001 This image is EVERYTHING that I strive to capture on film when I'm am photographing the homeless. Mine pale in comparison. Just because someone is poor or mentally ill or dying, it does not make them any less of a human being or any less attractive as a photography subject. I pity anyone who can't see only beauty when looking at this image. And, as someone who loves to photograph people, I've had to 'sneak' a good portion of my images - homeless or not. Unfortunately, you won't be able to publish this image without this man's permission and that is what I find tragic. Good work! Link to comment
gwen_barlee1 0 Posted January 9, 2002 such tender loving care with the toning, composition and light - i hope the gentlemen sleeping receives some also Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now