michael ezra 0 Posted June 20, 2001 I wonder what abstract assosiations this photo can bring to a viewer... I assume that you notice that the reflection is not really a reflection... Thank you, Michael Ezra Link to comment
adam_laverty 0 Posted June 20, 2001 Although I do like the overall colour and composition of the shot, I do believe that having the model's hands in different positions does detract from its reflective intent. Link to comment
michael ezra 0 Posted June 20, 2001 Adam Laverty, thank you for your comment. Although different hands position and different toning were intentionally done to signify falsiness of the reflection... they are never true :) even while overall look the same. Link to comment
nick_s 0 Posted June 20, 2001 To date, I have not been a big fan of digitally manipulated pictures... but there are exceptions, and this is definitely one of them. Begging to differ with the previous poster, I like the fact that the hands are in different positions. To me, it seems to be a battle between a supressed sexuality on the top vs. receptiveness on the bottom. Not sure if this was the intent, but it's my reaction to it. Beyond this psycho-"babble" analysis, I also find the picture visually pleasing. Link to comment
j._scott_schrader 0 Posted June 20, 2001 Graphically I like the image. The lines, shape and form are all very appealing to my eye. When I look at it and think about what I am seeing I don't really care for the models introspective (looking inside herself) pose. Nonetheless, this is a very well executed image. Link to comment
mark jones 0 Posted June 22, 2001 Love this phot as well as the rest in this folder. Can't wait to take Photos as good as yours. I really like how you had 2 diffrent posses with the ripple in the middle. I would coment on the other photo's but you know they are good so I won't. Link to comment
jaywett 0 Posted June 23, 2001 Wow, definitely out of my league! Very nice stuff. I like the contrasting hand position personally. This is stunning imagery. Link to comment
andres_mo 0 Posted June 25, 2001 the reflective circles do not work for me. I think that the rest of the photo is wonderful in its scope and detail. I do not know what to recommend in place of the "surface" circles, but they draw the eye to the digitalnature of the photo in an unpleasing manner. Link to comment
timberwolf 0 Posted January 7, 2002 I love your style, it's fresh and different, all of your pics in this file are great !!!! I like the ripples and the hand position change on this one. It is nice to see someone doing some thing out of the ordinary. Great Job ! Link to comment
pampolin 1 Posted March 5, 2002 your work is between the best in this site. I really would love to learn with you. Thank's man! Link to comment
carrie_d_oxendine 0 Posted March 26, 2002 HOW DID YOU DO THAT? I LIKE THIS IT'S SO ORIGINAL Link to comment
paul_norman_dicaire 0 Posted April 2, 2002 This is art. Clever, intellectual, original, subtle. Upon a casual look, the differences between the two images are not immediately apparent, which proves that we sometimes assume too much when we look at things. The title causes us to take a second look and it's then that we discover the true merit of this image. Impressive. Link to comment
tyler_buckley 0 Posted January 28, 2004 nice... at first I didn't even notice that iit was two different pictures, I realized that it was a false reflection but not the change in hand positions. Overall good picture and with more practice I believe you will be a great digital editor. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now