morey_kitzman 0 Posted June 29, 2004 I submitted a tmax version of this and it is really flat by comparison. It can be found in my BW folder. I starting to believe that Velvia and the Channel Mix to convert to BW is somehow superior to shooting straight BW. At least for some shots it seems to work much better. Any thoughts on that matter? Thanks for feedback. Link to comment
olivia 0 Posted June 29, 2004 I love your work. So many of these images are familiar, but are very interesting. You've done a great job of changing the perspective on traditional "Ansel" shots. Link to comment
josepmiro 0 Posted June 29, 2004 A really impressive photo. I like the sharpness, the tonal range and the clouds forming a diagonal line. Superb! Link to comment
photogabby 1 Posted June 29, 2004 Very 19th century and atmospheric. Not being a film photographer I have no comment on the film, but certainly channels rather than desaturate gives you far more control over the depth of "colour" you can achieve. Well done. Link to comment
aepelbacher 0 Posted June 29, 2004 I tend to find that I like different methods of conversion to B&W for different images. You're right about shooting with B&W film, though ... it eliminates the choice. I almost always take a color image and try each channel just to "see" what it will look like ... then I try "desaturate" then I try "greyscale" and THEN I try some combination of duo/tri/quad-tone to see what I like best. I haven't yet found a formula for approximating before all of the guess work which I'll like best, though. I like the almost-sepia feel to this image. Is that a hogan in the foreground? I've never been to the SW, but plan to go next summer. I can't wait ... am reading everything I can find on the subject, and am looking at LOTS of pics ... which is why I'm spending so much time in your portfolio lately. Thanks for sharing your talent with us!! Link to comment
sarahunderhill 1 Posted June 30, 2004 This is just beautiful and should be looked at LARGE.. Link to comment
morey_kitzman 0 Posted July 1, 2004 I would like to thank everyone for their feedback. Lou Ann that is a hogan in the foreground, according to my Navaho guide. You need a Navaho guide to accompany you to this area and they charge $15 per hour. So you just have to hope that you will have the right light when you get there. Link to comment
jon c 0 Posted July 1, 2004 Very nice tone and range. I like the way the composition is balanced by two mountains on each side and the foreground object. Link to comment
devotee 0 Posted July 1, 2004 A refreshingly different take on this well known location. Congratulations for that. I like the drama in the sky but don't like the burnt out highlight in the cloud. Was it burnt out on film too, or just an accident in the digital domain? Link to comment
henrimanguy 0 Posted July 1, 2004 Very great image. I have the impression to see a shot of Edward S. Curtis. Link to comment
roberto p 0 Posted July 2, 2004 Very good composition and the tone is wonderful. Congrats! Link to comment
lucabravo 0 Posted July 2, 2004 I like the details of this photo! great composition... Link to comment
sphoto 0 Posted October 15, 2004 Ok I saw all threee versions of this shot, and this one is best. Originally i was going to say the color was my favorite in terms of impact, but I think its because Ive been here and love the red colors and blue sky of its reality. however, this image stands above the others! The exposure and contrast is very dramatic, accentuating the clouds, the cliffs, spider rock and the hogan! Link to comment
todd_mcdonald 0 Posted June 6, 2006 Stunning image! Light, composition and tonality.... all flawless! Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now