mplonsky 0 Posted May 30, 2004 Trying to make a dung fly look good is not easy. Have I succeeded? Link to comment
harry eggens 0 Posted May 30, 2004 SUPER MACRO!!! with fantastic deails and sharpness...Take care, regards, Harry Link to comment
stephengalea 0 Posted May 30, 2004 WHT a Sharp image...also pose for the insect is greats.. weel done Link to comment
nick_seamore 0 Posted May 30, 2004 Yes, you succeed!!! As alway's this is also a perfect macro. Regards, Link to comment
kslonaker 0 Posted May 31, 2004 Nice color and composition. Not crazy about the name of the fly, but you've brought some class to the species with this image. Link to comment
pradeep1 0 Posted May 31, 2004 Its good to see you back after a long time, or i have not been seeing your recent posts ;) You have been my 'guru', and this time, you have out done yourself, an excellent pose (how do these bugs listen to you?? ;)). Kudos to the macro king. cheers! Link to comment
karen rexrode 0 Posted June 1, 2004 Yep, it's just amazing how you do this! Great job. Link to comment
rubens_abboud 0 Posted June 1, 2004 Mark, I don't even want to ask where you've been hanging around lately. Beautiful image and incredible technique, as always. I'm just relieved you decided to make a macro image of the dung fly and not the dung. Although now that I think about it, you can probably make dung look good, too. Congratulations on another winner. Rubens. Link to comment
jblair 0 Posted June 2, 2004 Mark, Been admiring your work for some time now. This is yet another great shot. Just out of curiousity, how far from the subject were you on this, and what zoom setting did you use on the G3? Link to comment
mplonsky 0 Posted June 5, 2004 Thanx to all for the comments and/or ratings. Pradeep- The bug pictures are seasonal (and the season is arriving). I try to take enough shots to keep me busy through the year, but prefer to only share the best of my work. James- the G3 was at full zoom (or it would vignette) and I had to be about 1.5 inches from the fly. This working distance seems to always be the case with the reverse 50mm technique (unless you reverse the 50 on a camera body). Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now