antonio.giacomo 0 Posted September 30, 2003 It was an unofficial commission by the College, with a view to a possible new postcard, since the hall had recently been renovated. The challenge here was to get the colours as accurate as possible. The deep terracotta of the lower panels may well have been traditional in 1594 (when the College was built), and the dark green leather of the chairs is just about the complimentary colour to deep terracotta. As you will see, there is a multiplicity of light sources. The paintings are illuminated by incandescent light, and the main lighting comes from fluorescent light reflected from the pale cream ceiling. Then there is the very cold north daylight coming in from the main window. Fortunately, the napkins and the menu cards are pure white, so a reasonable balance is possible. If you are visiting Cambridge, and taking photographs, do not expect to see anything like this. The tables are laid with the Colleges best silver in readiness for a commemoration dinner, and the security was very tight. There is a booboo. When I am taking photographs, I usually take my spectacles off, and put them down somewhere. This time I had forgotten where. They are at the fourth place setting on the right- hand table. I apologised to the client, and said that I could touch them out, but she said leave them there. It is like the artist who always put a mouse somewhere in his paintings. Link to comment
pradipta_saha 0 Posted October 2, 2003 maybe its my PC/browser, or loss of sharpness on scanning - but the otherwise great pic looks a bit out of focus Link to comment
antonio.giacomo 0 Posted October 6, 2003 Hi Pradipta Thanks for the comment. If the frame of the picture looks sharp, it is not your PC/Browser. There was no scanning, of course. The original image is pin sharp from front to back. The college crest can be made out on the menus, but the menu text itself is too small to read. Quite likely the problem is that the original image contained a huge amount of detail, and it was compressed by a factor of 1000 to post on photo.net. I might have got a sharper looking very small image by applying a huge amount of unsharp masking before the compression, but, since it is a commercial image, it is not in my interest to post a high quality image. Thanks anyway. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now