Jump to content
© Copyright 2003 James Etheridge

A trick of the light?


antonio.giacomo

Tri-X at 1600 in Speedibrews 422.

Copyright

© Copyright 2003 James Etheridge
  • Like 1

From the category:

Street

· 124,999 images
  • 124,999 images
  • 442,920 image comments


Recommended Comments

I had to look at this twice. The lady seems to be wearing a

transparent dress, or was it a trick of the light?

 

The tonal range of the negative is extreme far too great to get

into a 16-bit channel, let alone 8 bits. If I have time, I will try

printing it properly, but, perhaps, it might be better to spend the

time writing some intelligent software to do it.

Link to comment

Hi Tony,

 

The reason I am using Tri-X for available light work is that it can be pushed two stops to give a true ISO 1600 rating, which is effectively faster than the 3200 films, and has finer grain. However, it does need a low-gamma developer for the pushing, otherwise you will end up with very contrasty negatives, which can be printed on soft paper, but do not scan at all well.

 

For an ISO 400 black and white film I use Kodak T400 CN, which gives significantly better results than Tri-X with standard development. It can be pushed to 1600, but Tri-X is better at that speed.

 

Link to comment
Many thanks Antonio, I'll shoot a couple of rolls & see how I get on with it.
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...